Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302446›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2017

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves for heterogeneous emphysema: long-term results.

Alfonso Fiorelli, Carlo Santoriello, Alberto De Felice, Francesco Ferrigno, Annalisa Carlucci, Emanuele De Ruberto, Rossella Mastromarino, Lisa Occhiati, Gaetana Messina, Elena Santoriello and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endobronchial valves for severe emphysema.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfonso FiorelliThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Carlo SantorielloDepartment of Pneumology and Endoscopic Unit, Ospedale Scarlato, Scafati, Italy.
Alberto De FeliceRehabilitation Unit, Clinica Maugeri, Telese, Italy.
Francesco FerrignoDepartment of Pneumology, Villa Stabia Hospital, Castellamare di Stabia, Italy.
Annalisa CarlucciThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Emanuele De RubertoThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Rossella MastromarinoThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Lisa OcchiatiThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Gaetana MessinaThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Elena SantorielloDepartment of Pneumology and Endoscopic Unit, Ospedale Scarlato, Scafati, Italy.
Giovanni VicidominiThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mario PolverinoDepartment of Pneumology and Endoscopic Unit, Ospedale Scarlato, Scafati, Italy.
Mario SantiniThoracic Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with implant of one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) is a feasible treatment for management of heterogeneous emphysema (HE) with clinical benefits in the early follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the long-terms results and safety of this procedure in a consecutive series of patients with HE.

methodsIt was a retrospective single center study including all consecutive patients with HE undergoing EBV treatment and completing at least 5 years of long-term follow-up. Patients were splitted into Collapse and No-Collapse Group if a lobar collapse or not were obtained after valves implant. The difference of functional data and quality of life (QoL) before and after the procedure (measured at 3, 6, 9, 12 months from the valve implantation, and then annually up to a maximum of 5 years) were statistically evaluated to show the long-term benefits of the procedure (primary endpoint). Yet, morbidity, mortality and survival rates were also recorded to show the safe of the treatment (secondary endpoint).

resultsThirty-three patients were included in the study. Of these, three patients underwent a bilateral treatment. Collapse Group patients (n=27) presented a significant improvement in FEV1% (+17%; P=0.001); in FVC% (+18%; P=0.002); in RV% (-39%; P=0.003); in 6MWT (P=0.001) and in SGRQ (P=0.001) in the early 12 months of follow-up and no significant decline was seen later. Conversely, No-Collapse Group (n=9) did not have significant benefits. No major complications and death related to the procedure were observed. The 1-,2-,3-,4- and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 90%, 78%, 71% and 71%, respectively. Collapse Group had a better survival than No-Collapse Group (45

conclusionsOur study confirmed that the lobar collapse is the key success of EBV treatment and the early improvements of respiratory function could be maintained up to five years from the valves implant.

Indexed as

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR)endobronchial valves (EBV)heterogeneous emphysema (HE)

Identifiers

PMID29302446
PMCPMC5730531
OpenAlexW2768918797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.