Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302358›Full record

ReviewNPJ Regenerative medicine2017

Translational considerations in injectable cell-based therapeutics for neurological applications: concepts, progress and challenges.

Mahetab H Amer, Felicity R A J Rose, Kevin M Shakesheff, Michel Modo, Lisa J White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. OPTRACE: Optical Imaging-Guided Transplantation and Tracking of Cells in the Mouse Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahetab H AmerSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Felicity R A J RoseSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Kevin M ShakesheffSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
Michel ModoMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Lisa J WhiteSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-999X

Funding

Non-invasive Imaging of the In Situ Restoration of Brain TissueR01NS082226 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MODO, MICHEL M. · 2014 to 2016
$921k
Medical Research Council MR/K026682/1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress has been made during the past decade towards the clinical adoption of cell-based therapeutics. However, existing cell-delivery approaches have shown limited success, with numerous studies showing fewer than 5% of injected cells persisting at the site of injection within days of transplantation. Although consideration is being increasingly given to clinical trial design, little emphasis has been given to tools and protocols used to administer cells. The different behaviours of various cell types, dosing accuracy, precise delivery, and cell retention and viability post-injection are some of the obstacles facing clinical translation. For efficient injectable cell transplantation, accurate characterisation of cellular health post-injection and the development of standardised administration protocols are required. This review provides an overview of the challenges facing effective delivery of cell therapies, examines key studies that have been carried out to investigate injectable cell delivery, and outlines opportunities for translating these findings into more effective cell-therapy interventions.

Identifiers

PMID29302358
PMCPMC5677964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.