Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302185›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2017

Much to Debate about Conscientious Objection.

Wendy Chavkin, Laurel Swerdlow, Jocelyn Fifield

Abstract readComment
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wendy ChavkinProfessor of population and family health and obstetrics-gynecology at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Laurel SwerdlowAdvocacy director at Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon.
Jocelyn FifieldRecently graduated from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and has been a consultant at Ibis Reproductive Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHuman RightsAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29302185
PMCPMC5739379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.