Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302131›Full record

ArticleAgricultural systems2018

Climate smart agriculture, farm household typologies and food security: An

Santiago Lopez-Ridaura, Romain Frelat, Mark T van Wijk, Diego Valbuena, Timothy J Krupnik, M L Jat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agricultural systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Farm resilience to climatic risk. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Santiago Lopez-RidauraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Intensification Program and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Apdo, 6-641 06600, México, D.F., Mexico.
Romain FrelatInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Intensification Program and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Apdo, 6-641 06600, México, D.F., Mexico.
Mark T van WijkInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Livestock Systems and the Environment, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Diego ValbuenaInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Sub-regional Office for Central America Planes de Altamira, de Pizza Hut Villa Fontana 1 cuadra al oeste Edificio CAR III, 4to. Piso Apartado, LM-172 Managua, Nicaragua.
Timothy J KrupnikInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Intensification Program and MAIZE CGIAR Research Program, House10/B, Road 53, Gulshan-2, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh.
M L JatInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Intensification Program and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012. India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the great challenges in agricultural development and sustainable intensification is the assurance of social equity in food security oriented interventions. Development practitioners, researchers, and policy makers alike could benefit from prior insight into what interventions or environmental shocks might differentially affect farmers' food security status, in order to move towards more informed and equitable development. We examined the food security status and livelihood activities of 269 smallholder farm households (HHs) in Bihar, India. Proceeding with a four-step analysis, we first applied a multivariate statistical methodology to differentiate five primary farming system types. We next applied an indicator of food security in the form of HH potential food availability (PFA), and examined the contribution of crop, livestock, and on- and off-farm income generation to PFA within each farm HH type. Lastly, we applied scenario analysis to examine the potential impact of the adoption of 'climate smart' agricultural (CSA) practices in the form of conservation agriculture (CA) and improved livestock husbandry, and environmental shocks on HH PFA. Our results indicate that compared to livestock interventions, CA may hold considerable potential to boost HH PFA, though primarily for wealthier and medium-scale cereal farmers. These farm HH types were however considerably more vulnerable to food insecurity risks resulting from simulated drought, while part-time farmers and resource-poor agricultural laborers generating income from off-farm pursuits were comparatively less vulnerable, due in part to their more diversified income sources and potential to migrate in search of work. Our results underscore the importance of prior planning for development initiatives aimed at increasing smallholder food security while maintaining social equity, while providing a robust methodology to vet the implications of agricultural interventions on an

Indexed as

BiharConservation agricultureDroughtLivestockScenario evaluation, Climate changeSocio-ecological system

Identifiers

PMID29302131
PMCPMC5738964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.