ArticleAgricultural systems2018
Climate smart agriculture, farm household typologies and food security: An
Article in Agricultural systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Farm Typologies of Banana and Plantain Smallholders: Agricultural Practices and Disease Constraints in Department of Huila, Colombia.Scientifica · 2025Article
- Farm resilience to climatic risk. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2025Review
- Climate change and resilience, adaptation, and sustainability of agriculture in India: A bibliometric review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Climate-smart irrigation and responsible innovation in South Asia: A systematic mapping.Ambio · 2023Review
- Article
- Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Farm size limits agriculture's poverty reduction potential in Eastern India even with irrigation-led intensification.Agricultural systems · 2023Article
- Towards gender-inclusive innovation: Assessing local conditions for agricultural targeting.PloS one · 2022Article
- How Could the Use of Crop Wild Relatives in Breeding Increase the Adaptation of Crops to Marginal Environments?Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda.Outlook on agriculture · 2021Article
- Technical efficiency among agricultural households and determinants of food security in East Java, Indonesia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Perspective article: Actions to reconfigure food systems.Global food security · 2020Article
- Farmers' preferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria.Agricultural systems · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the great challenges in agricultural development and sustainable intensification is the assurance of social equity in food security oriented interventions. Development practitioners, researchers, and policy makers alike could benefit from prior insight into what interventions or environmental shocks might differentially affect farmers' food security status, in order to move towards more informed and equitable development. We examined the food security status and livelihood activities of 269 smallholder farm households (HHs) in Bihar, India. Proceeding with a four-step analysis, we first applied a multivariate statistical methodology to differentiate five primary farming system types. We next applied an indicator of food security in the form of HH potential food availability (PFA), and examined the contribution of crop, livestock, and on- and off-farm income generation to PFA within each farm HH type. Lastly, we applied scenario analysis to examine the potential impact of the adoption of 'climate smart' agricultural (CSA) practices in the form of conservation agriculture (CA) and improved livestock husbandry, and environmental shocks on HH PFA. Our results indicate that compared to livestock interventions, CA may hold considerable potential to boost HH PFA, though primarily for wealthier and medium-scale cereal farmers. These farm HH types were however considerably more vulnerable to food insecurity risks resulting from simulated drought, while part-time farmers and resource-poor agricultural laborers generating income from off-farm pursuits were comparatively less vulnerable, due in part to their more diversified income sources and potential to migrate in search of work. Our results underscore the importance of prior planning for development initiatives aimed at increasing smallholder food security while maintaining social equity, while providing a robust methodology to vet the implications of agricultural interventions on an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.