ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2017
Forty Years of ACPE CPE Accreditation.
Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of knowledge sharing network indicator system for medication therapy management service training teams based on social network analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluation of factors affecting pharmacists and pharmacy technicians' satisfaction towards practicing CE activities in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- Implementing Activity-Based Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation in Canada: Challenges and Proposed Solutions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Study of knowledge, attitude and practice regarding patient education in hypertension among community pharmacists in China.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Perception of community pharmacists about the work process of drug dispensing: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC health services research · 2022Review
- A review of the continuous professional development system for pharmacists.Human resources for health · 2022Review
- Advancing the Adoption of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in the United States.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Learn Today-Apply Tomorrow: The SMART Pharmacist Program.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Global Forum on Quality Assurance in CE/CPD: Assuring Quality across Boundaries.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A Cross-sectional Survey of California Pharmacists' Knowledge and Perceptions about Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).The California journal of health-system pharmacy : CJHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Continuing Pharmacy Education (CPE) Provider Accreditation Program has been in existence for 40 years. During this time, the program has expanded and has been offered to a various types of providers, not only academic-based providers. ACPE credit has been offered to an increasing number of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and other health professionals. This paper explains the evolution of the CPE Provider Accreditation Program, including the Definition of Continuing Education for the Profession of Pharmacy, its standards, types of activities (knowledge, application, and practice), CPE Monitor, Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education, and Continuing Professional Development (CPD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.