ArticleBMC cancer2018
Development of the body image self-rating questionnaire for breast cancer (BISQ-BC) for Chinese mainland patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Instruments for measuring body image in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of measurement properties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- The Impact of a Positive Body Image Program (Body Image Awareness Seminars) on the Positive and Negative Body Image of Individuals Living With Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Beyond Scars: Development and Validation of a Four-Dimensional Body Image Score for Women with Breast and Gynecological Cancers - A Tunisian Multicenter Study.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Assessing the factors associated with body image perception and quality of life of Palestinian women undergoing breast cancer treatment: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- The mediating effect of coping styles between self-compassion and body image disturbance in young breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Association of self-compassion and body image disturbance among young breast cancer patients: Mediating effect of body surveillance and body shame.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Assessing the relationship between body image and quality of life among rural and urban breast cancer survivors in China.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Development and validation of the regarding infection prevention and control among environmental service workers on knowledge, attitudes, practise, and experience questionnaire.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Body image mediates the relationship between post-surgery needs and health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBody image is a complex post-treatment concern among female patients with breast cancer, and various tools have been developed and applied to measure this multifaceted issue. However, these available tools were developed in other countries and only a few have been modified into Chinese versions. Furthermore, body-image evaluation instruments that are specific to Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer have not been devised yet. Therefore, we developed the Body Image Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer for Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer.
methodsWe performed two rounds of the Delphi technique and a cross-sectional pilot survey. Items were selected using a Likert scale (1-5) to determine ratings of importance (i.e., the significance of the item from experts' perspective; coefficients of variation ≤0.25), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70), convergent validity (hypothesized item-subscale correlations ≥0.40), and discriminant validity (stronger correlations of the item with the hypothesized subscale than for other subscales). All decisions on items were made based on statistical analysis results, experts' recommendations, and in-depth discussion among researchers.
resultsTwenty-five eligible experts completed the two Delphi rounds (mean age: 42.20 ± 8.90 years). Over half the experts were professors (56%, n = 14) or worked as clinical staff (68%, n = 17). Twenty (mean age = 49.55 ± 10.01 years) and 50 patients (mean age = 48.44 ± 9.98 years) completed the first- and second-round survey, respectively. Over half the patients had a tertiary education level, were married, and were employed. Regarding the revised questionnaire (comprising 33 items across seven subscales), the expert panelists' ratings of each item met the criteria (Kendall's W = 0.238, p < .001). Five subscales had a Cronbach's α value over 0.60 (range: 0.62-0.69) and two subscales were over 0.80 (range: 0.84-0.88). All items satisfied the criteria for convergent and discriminant validity.
conclusionsThe findings of this study provide evidence of a suitable tool for body image evaluation among Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer. Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to validate this questionnaire in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.