Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29301503›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Development of the body image self-rating questionnaire for breast cancer (BISQ-BC) for Chinese mainland patients.

Kaina Zhou, Xiaole He, Lanting Huo, Jinghua An, Minjie Li, Wen Wang, Xiaomei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Instruments for measuring body image in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of measurement properties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaina ZhouXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Xiaole HeXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Lanting HuoXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Jinghua AnXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Minjie LiXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Wen WangXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Xiaomei LiXi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, 76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China. roselee@xjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody image is a complex post-treatment concern among female patients with breast cancer, and various tools have been developed and applied to measure this multifaceted issue. However, these available tools were developed in other countries and only a few have been modified into Chinese versions. Furthermore, body-image evaluation instruments that are specific to Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer have not been devised yet. Therefore, we developed the Body Image Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer for Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer.

methodsWe performed two rounds of the Delphi technique and a cross-sectional pilot survey. Items were selected using a Likert scale (1-5) to determine ratings of importance (i.e., the significance of the item from experts' perspective; coefficients of variation ≤0.25), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70), convergent validity (hypothesized item-subscale correlations ≥0.40), and discriminant validity (stronger correlations of the item with the hypothesized subscale than for other subscales). All decisions on items were made based on statistical analysis results, experts' recommendations, and in-depth discussion among researchers.

resultsTwenty-five eligible experts completed the two Delphi rounds (mean age: 42.20 ± 8.90 years). Over half the experts were professors (56%, n = 14) or worked as clinical staff (68%, n = 17). Twenty (mean age = 49.55 ± 10.01 years) and 50 patients (mean age = 48.44 ± 9.98 years) completed the first- and second-round survey, respectively. Over half the patients had a tertiary education level, were married, and were employed. Regarding the revised questionnaire (comprising 33 items across seven subscales), the expert panelists' ratings of each item met the criteria (Kendall's W = 0.238, p < .001). Five subscales had a Cronbach's α value over 0.60 (range: 0.62-0.69) and two subscales were over 0.80 (range: 0.84-0.88). All items satisfied the criteria for convergent and discriminant validity.

conclusionsThe findings of this study provide evidence of a suitable tool for body image evaluation among Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer. Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to validate this questionnaire in this patient population.

Indexed as

Body ImageAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsChinaDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesBody imageBreast cancerChinaMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID29301503
PMCPMC5753569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.