Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29301026›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2018

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Procedural Learning in Nonclinical Psychosis: A Double-Blind Crossover Study.

Tina Gupta, Derek J Dean, Nicholas J Kelley, Jessica A Bernard, Ivanka Ristanovic, Vijay A Mittal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Motor precision deficits in clinical high risk for psychosis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina GuptaDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Derek J DeanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Nicholas J KelleyDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Jessica A BernardDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Ivanka RistanovicDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE NEUROSCIENCE OF HUMAN COGNITIONT32NS047987 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Rodrigo M Braga, Christina Maria Zelano · 2006 to 2026
$5.6M
Frontal-Subcortical Development, Movement Abnormalities, and Risk for PsychosisR01MH094650 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR33MH103231 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2016 to 2018
$689k
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR21MH103231 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2014 to 2015
$489k
Neural Habituation in Ultra High-Risk YouthR21MH110374 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2018
$445k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094650NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH103231NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH110374NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH103231NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS047987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present double-blind crossover study examines the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in controls and in an analogue population to psychosis: individuals reporting elevated symptoms of nonclinical psychosis (NCP). A total of 18 controls and 24 NCP individuals were randomized into conditions consisting of 25 minutes of anodal (active) or sham cerebellar tDCS. Following this, both groups completed a pursuit rotor task designed to measure procedural learning performance. Participants then returned 1-week later and received the corresponding condition (either active or sham) and repeated the pursuit rotor task. Results indicate that in the sham condition, control participants showed significantly greater rates of motor learning when compared with the NCP group. In the active condition, the NCP group exhibited significant improvements in the rate of motor learning and performed at a level that was comparable to controls; these data support the link between cerebellar dysfunction and motor learning. Taken together, tDCS may be a promising treatment mechanism for patient populations and a useful experimental approach in elucidating our understanding of psychosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellumCognitive DysfunctionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformancePsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29301026
PMCPMC6192475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.