Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29300973›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2018

Social Cognitive Skills Training for Psychosis With Community-Based Training Exercises: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

William P Horan, Michelle Dolinsky, Junghee Lee, Robert S Kern, Gerhard Hellemann, Catherine A Sugar, Shirley M Glynn, Michael F Green

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William P HoranVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Michelle DolinskyVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Junghee LeeVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Robert S KernVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Gerhard HellemannVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Catherine A SugarVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Shirley M GlynnVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael F GreenVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairments in social cognition are key determinants of poor functioning in psychosis and an important new target for treatment development. Initial studies support the feasibility and efficacy of training interventions for social cognition, but have been small and have had substantial methodological limitations. This report describes the largest rigorously controlled study of a social cognitive treatment to date. We evaluated the efficacy of a refined version of the 24-session Social Cognitive Skills Training (SCST) program, and whether adding in vivo training sessions in community settings would enhance generalization to functional improvements. One hundred thirty-nine outpatients with psychotic disorders were randomly assigned to one of 3 time- and format-matched conditions: (1) SCST plus in vivo community-based training, (2) SCST plus clinic-based training, or (3) Illness management control condition. SCST targeted the domains of emotion processing, social perception, attributional bias, empathy, and mentalizing. Assessments of social cognition, nonsocial cognition, symptoms, and functioning were completed at baseline, mid-treatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. On the primary social cognitive outcome measures, there was significant, durable SCST-related improvement in facial emotion identification. There was also a significant SCST benefit for emotional intelligence and an in vivo training effect for empathy, though these improvements were not durable. Further, there were no overall or in vivo-related changes in functioning. This study bolsters and extends support for the efficacy of SCST in a relatively large and rigorously controlled trial, although our effort to enhance generalization to functional improvements through in vivo community-based training was not successful.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionSocial SkillsAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Mental Health ServicesEmotionsEmpathyFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMentalizationMiddle AgedPsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29300973
PMCPMC6192506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.