ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Ten simple rules for biologists learning to program.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Galaxy as a gateway to bioinformatics: Multi-Interface Galaxy Hands-on Training Suite (MIGHTS) for scRNA-seq.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Advancing bioinformatics capacity through Nextflow and nf-core: lessons from an early-to mid-career researchers-focused program at The Kids Research Institute Australia.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Teaching bioinformatics through the analysis of SARS-CoV-2: project-based training for computer science students.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for teaching yourself R.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for managing communications with a large number of coauthors.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for getting started with statistics in graduate school.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A field guide to cultivating computational biology.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Graphery: interactive tutorials for biological network algorithms.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for quick and dirty scientific programming.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for running and managing virtual internships.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for getting started with command-line bioinformatics.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for navigating the computational aspect of an interdisciplinary PhD.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for tackling your first mathematical models: A guide for graduate students by graduate students.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Templates for writing PyMOL scripts.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Twelve quick steps for genome assembly and annotation in the classroom.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules to increase computational skills among biologists with Code Clubs.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.