ArticlePloS one2018
Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990-2013): A scientometric analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Analysis of the Current State of COPD Nursing Based on a Bibliometric Approach from the Web of Science.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Proposing a holistic research framework for university strategic alliances in sustainable entrepreneurship.Heliyon · 2023Review
- A scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial intention literature: Delving deeper into local citation.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Article
- Evolution of customer relationship management to data mining-based customer relationship management: a scientometric analysis.Quality & quantity · 2022Article
- Scientometric Review for Research Patterns on Additive Manufacturing of Lattice Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Worldwide Research Trends in Landslide Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Science maps for exploration, navigation, and reflection-A graphic approach to strategic thinking.PloS one · 2021Article
- Development of a computerized adaptive test to assess entrepreneurial personality.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2020Article
- Assessment of Eight Entrepreneurial Personality Dimensions: Validity Evidence of the BEPE Battery.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article applies scientometric techniques to study the evolution of the field of entrepreneurship between 1990 and 2013. Using a combination of topic mapping, author and journal co-citation analyses, and overlay visualization of new and hot topics in the field, this article makes important contribution to the entrepreneurship research by identifying 46 topics in the 24-year history of entrepreneurship research and demonstrates how they appear, disappear, reappear and stabilize over time. It also identifies five topics that are persistent across the 24-year study period--institutions and institutional entrepreneurship, innovation and technology management, policy and development, entrepreneurial process and opportunity, and new ventures--which I labeled as The Pentagon of Entrepreneurship. Overall, the analyses revealed patterns of convergence and divergence and the diversity of topics, specialization, and interdisciplinary engagement in entrepreneurship research, thus offering the latest insights on the state of the art of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.