Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29300380›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Development and evaluation of a genomics training program for community health workers in Texas.

Lei-Shih Chen, Shixi Zhao, Donaji Stelzig, Shweta U Dhar, Tanya Eble, Yu-Chen Yeh, Oi-Man Kwok

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  8. Issues associated with a hereditary risk of cancer: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses in oncology settings.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei-Shih ChenDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA, Texas. lacechen@tamu.edu.
Shixi ZhaoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA, Texas.
Donaji StelzigDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA, Texas.
Shweta U DharDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA, Texas.
Tanya EbleDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA, Texas.
Yu-Chen YehDepartment of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA, Texas.
Oi-Man KwokDepartment of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenomics services have the potential to reduce incidence and mortality of diseases by providing individualized, family health history (FHH)-based prevention strategies to clients. These services may benefit from the involvement of community health workers (CHWs) in the provision of FHH-based genomics education and services, as CHWs are frontline public health workers and lay health educators, who share similar ethnicities, languages, socioeconomic statuses, and life experiences with the communities they serve. We developed, implemented, and evaluated the FHH-based genomics training program for CHWs.

methodsThis theory- and evidence-based FHH-focused genomics curriculum was developed by an interdisciplinary team. Full-day workshops in English and Spanish were delivered to 145 Texas CHWs (91.6% were Hispanic/black). Preworkshop, postworkshop, and 3-month follow-up data were collected.

resultsCHWs significantly improved their attitudes, intention, self-efficacy, and knowledge regarding adopting FHH-based genomics into their practice after the workshops. At 3-month follow-up, these scores remained higher, and there was a significant increase in CHWs' genomics practices.

conclusionThis FHH-based genomics training successfully educated Texas CHWs, and the outcomes were promising. Dissemination of training to CHWs in and outside of Texas is needed to promote better access to and delivery of personalized genomics services for the lay and underserved communities.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health WorkersCurriculumEducationFemaleGenomicsHealth EducatorsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleTexascommunity health workereducation; family health historygeneticsgenomics

Identifiers

PMID29300380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.