Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29300332›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Role of Microenvironment in Glioma Invasion: What We Learned from In Vitro Models.

Ivana Manini, Federica Caponnetto, Anna Bartolini, Tamara Ius, Laura Mariuzzi, Carla Di Loreto, Antonio Paolo Beltrami, Daniela Cesselli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glioma-Derived Exosomes and Their Application as Drug Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Biomaterial-basedCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivana ManiniDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. ivana.manini@tiscalinet.it.
Federica CaponnettoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. the_capo@hotmail.com.
Anna BartoliniDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. anna.bartolini90@hotmail.it.
Tamara IusNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. tamara.ius@gmail.com.
Laura MariuzziDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. laura.mariuzzi@uniud.it.
Carla Di LoretoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. carla.diloreto@uniud.it.
Antonio Paolo BeltramiDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. antonio.beltrami@uniud.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0679-2710
Daniela CesselliDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy. daniela.cesselli@uniud.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invasion properties of glioblastoma hamper a radical surgery and are responsible for its recurrence. Understanding the invasion mechanisms is thus critical to devise new therapeutic strategies. Therefore, the creation of in vitro models that enable these mechanisms to be studied represents a crucial step. Since in vitro models represent an over-simplification of the in vivo system, in these years it has been attempted to increase the level of complexity of in vitro assays to create models that could better mimic the behaviour of the cells in vivo. These levels of complexity involved: 1. The dimension of the system, moving from two-dimensional to three-dimensional models; 2. The use of microfluidic systems; 3. The use of mixed cultures of tumour cells and cells of the tumour micro-environment in order to mimic the complex cross-talk between tumour cells and their micro-environment; 4. And the source of cells used in an attempt to move from commercial lines to patient-based models. In this review, we will summarize the evidence obtained exploring these different levels of complexity and highlighting advantages and limitations of each system used.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalTumor MicroenvironmentBrain NeoplasmsCell CommunicationGliomaHumansNeoplasm Invasiveness3D cultureglioblastomaglioma-associated stem cellsinvasion assaymicrofluidic systemsmixed culturepersonalized medicinetumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29300332
PMCPMC5796096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.