Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29300280›Full record

ReviewPain2018

Sensory profiling in animal models of neuropathic pain: a call for back-translation.

Andrew S C Rice, Nanna B Finnerup, Harriet I Kemp, Gillian L Currie, Ralf Baron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Cannabinoid CBBritish journal of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Neuropathic pain; what we know and what we should do about it.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Therapeutic Applications for Fumarates.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew S C RicePain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Nanna B FinnerupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Harriet I KempPain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Gillian L CurrieCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ralf BaronDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000659/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHyperalgesiaNeuralgiaPain MeasurementPain Perception

Identifiers

PMID29300280
PMCPMC5911154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.