Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29300002›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Design strategies for dynamic closed-loop optogenetic neurocontrol in vivo.

M F Bolus, A A Willats, C J Whitmire, C J Rozell, G B Stanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bayesian target optimisation for high-precision holographic optogenetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M F BolusWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
A A WillatsWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
C J WhitmireWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
C J RozellSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
G B StanleyWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2039-7706

Funding

Thalamic synchrony and the gating of information flow to cortexR01NS048285 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2004 to 2014
$2.3M
MULTISCALE ANALYSIS OF SENSORY-MOTOR CORTICAL GATING IN BEHAVING MICEU01NS094302 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAEGER, DIETER, STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
In-vivo control of information flow by artificial stimulation: ephys and behaviorR01NS085447 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
From Cells to Systems and Applications: Computational Neuroscience Training at EmT90DA032466 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAEGER, DIETER, STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2011 to 2015
$817k
Controlling thalamic state for somatosensory information flow in thalamusF31NS089412 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WHITMIRE, CLARISSA J · 2014 to 2016
$129k
NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA032466NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS089412NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048285NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085447NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS094302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveControlling neural activity enables the possibility of manipulating sensory perception, cognitive processes, and body movement, in addition to providing a powerful framework for functionally disentangling the neural circuits that underlie these complex phenomena. Over the last decade, optogenetic stimulation has become an increasingly important and powerful tool for understanding neural circuit function, owing to the ability to target specific cell types and bidirectionally modulate neural activity. To date, most stimulation has been provided in open-loop or in an on/off closed-loop fashion, where previously-determined stimulation is triggered by an event. Here, we describe and demonstrate a design approach for precise optogenetic control of neuronal firing rate modulation using feedback to guide stimulation continuously. APPROACH: Using the rodent somatosensory thalamus as an experimental testbed for realizing desired time-varying patterns of firing rate modulation, we utilized a moving average exponential filter to estimate firing rate online from single-unit spiking measured extracellularly. This estimate of instantaneous rate served as feedback for a proportional integral (PI) controller, which was designed during the experiment based on a linear-nonlinear Poisson (LNP) model of the neuronal response to light. MAIN

resultsThe LNP model fit during the experiment enabled robust closed-loop control, resulting in good tracking of sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal targets, and rejection of unmeasured disturbances. Closed-loop control also enabled manipulation of trial-to-trial variability. SIGNIFICANCE: Because neuroscientists are faced with the challenge of dissecting the functions of circuit components, the ability to maintain control of a region of interest in spite of changes in ongoing neural activity will be important for disambiguating function within networks. Closed-loop stimulation strategies are ideal for control that is robust to such changes, and the employment of continuous feedback to adjust stimulation in real-time can improve the quality of data collected using optogenetic manipulation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleOptogeneticsPoisson DistributionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySomatosensory CortexThalamus

Identifiers

PMID29300002
PMCPMC5957547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.