Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299878›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Talent Identification and Development in Male Football: A Systematic Review.

Hugo Sarmento, M Teresa Anguera, Antonino Pereira, Duarte Araújo

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Talent Identification and Development in Male Futsal: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. A Review of Players' Characterization and Game Performance on Male Rink-Hockey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Decision-Making in Youth Team-Sports Players: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hugo SarmentoResearch Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. hugo.sarmento@uc.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-0642
M Teresa AngueraFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonino PereiraCentro de Estudos em Educação, Tecnologias e Saúde (CI&DETS), Escola Superior de Educação, Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Duarte AraújoCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Spertlab, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

Centre for the Study of Education, Technologies and Health (CI&DETS) PROJ/CI&DETS/2015/0001Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/DTP/UI447/2013Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad DEP2015-66069-P, MINECO/FEDER, UEMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad PSI2015-71947-REDP, MINECO/FEDER, UE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpertise has been extensively studied in several sports over recent years. The specificities of how excellence is achieved in Association Football, a sport practiced worldwide, are being repeatedly investigated by many researchers through a variety of approaches and scientific disciplines.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to identify and synthesise the most significant literature addressing talent identification and development in football. We identified the most frequently researched topics and characterised their methodologies.

methodsA systematic review of Web of Science™ Core Collection and Scopus databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The following keywords were used: "football" and "soccer". Each word was associated with the terms "talent", "expert*", "elite", "elite athlete", "identification", "career transition" or "career progression". The selection was for the original articles in English containing relevant data about talent development/identification on male footballers.

resultsThe search returned 2944 records. After screening against set criteria, a total of 70 manuscripts were fully reviewed. The quality of the evidence reviewed was generally excellent. The most common topics of analysis were (1) task constraints: (a) specificity and volume of practice; (2) performers' constraints: (a) psychological factors; (b) technical and tactical skills; (c) anthropometric and physiological factors; (3) environmental constraints: (a) relative age effect; (b) socio-cultural influences; and (4) multidimensional analysis. Results indicate that the most successful players present technical, tactical, anthropometric, physiological and psychological advantages that change non-linearly with age, maturational status and playing positions. These findings should be carefully considered by those involved in the identification and development of football players.

conclusionThis review highlights the need for coaches and scouts to consider the players' technical and tactical skills combined with their anthropometric and physiological characteristics scaled to age. Moreover, research addressing the psychological and environmental aspects that influence talent identification and development in football is currently lacking. The limitations detected in the reviewed studies suggest that future research should include the best performers and adopt a longitudinal and multidimensional perspective.

Indexed as

AptitudeFootballAthletesAthletic PerformanceHumansMalePersonalitySoccer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.