Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Proposals for best-quality immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded brain tissue slides in forensics.

Florian Trautz, Jan Dreßler, Ruth Stassart, Wolf Müller, Benjamin Ondruschka

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Forensic neuropathology in the past decade: a scoping literature review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  3. Differential HLA class I subunit (A, B, C heavy chain and βVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  4. GFAP positivity in neurons following traumatic brain injuries.International journal of legal medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian TrautzInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jan DreßlerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ruth StassartDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Wolf MüllerDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Benjamin OndruschkaInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. benjamin.ondruschka@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an integral part in forensic histopathology over the last decades. However, the underlying methods for IHC vary greatly depending on the institution, creating a lack of comparability. The aim of this study was to assess the optimal approach for different technical aspects of IHC, in order to improve and standardize this procedure. Therefore, qualitative results from manual and automatic IHC staining of brain samples were compared, as well as potential differences in suitability of common IHC glass slides. Further, possibilities of image digitalization and connected issues were investigated. In our study, automatic staining showed more consistent staining results, compared to manual staining procedures. Digitalization and digital post-processing facilitated direct analysis and analysis for reproducibility considerably. No differences were found for different commercially available microscopic glass slides regarding suitability of IHC brain researches, but a certain rate of tissue loss should be expected during the staining process.

Indexed as

BrainForensic PathologyGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryParaffin EmbeddingReproducibility of ResultsStaining and LabelingGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinBiomarkerEvaluationForensic neuropathologyGFAPImmunohistochemistryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID29299666
OpenAlexW2781997479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.