ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018
Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement?
Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between multimorbidity and quality of life after hip replacement surgery: analysis of routinely collected patient-reported outcomes.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Radiographic signs and hip pain 5 years after THA with a cemented stem predict future revision for aseptic loosening: a prospective cohort study.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- Outcome scores after hip surgery in young adults: an editorial approach.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications.Current anesthesiology reports · 2022Review
- Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures.Neurospine · 2021Article
- Effect of continuous nursing combined with salcatonin on postoperative pains in elderly patients after hip replacement.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Does failure to meet threshold scores for mHHS and iHOT-12 correlate to secondary operations following hip arthroscopy?Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
- CORR Insights®: What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019Article
- Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
- Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Medical device surveillance with electronic health records.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
- High-volume surgeons and high-volume journals in a multivariate orthopedic environment.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Successful initial experience with a novel outpatient total hip arthroplasty program in a public health system in Chile.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe investigated if patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year after total hip replacement (THR) can predict the risk of re-operation using data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
methodsA total of 75,899 patients with THR due to osteoarthritis operated in 2002-2014 were included. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to investigate the relationship between one-year post-operative PROMs and risk of re-operation (all types of further hip surgery). The predictive power of the model and post-operative PROMs were evaluated by concordance index (C).
resultsKaplan-Meier estimates for not being re-operated at eight years was 95.5% (95%CI; 95.3-95.8). Cox regression analyses showed that all PROMs, except for EQ-VAS, were associated with re-operation. The full model had a concordance index of 0.68. Satisfaction (C = 0.65) and pain (C = 0.65) in isolation had the highest predictive power.
conclusionsWorse PROMs predicted higher risk of re-operation. Therefore, we believe PROMs may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for re-operation and timely address their problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29299650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.