Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299602›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2018

Effect of Standardized Handoff Curriculum on Improved Clinician Preparedness in the Intensive Care Unit: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Brodie Parent, Lacey N LaGrone, Mohamed T Albirair, Peter T Serina, Jonathan M Keller, Joseph Cuschieri, Erin J Addison, Lapio Choe, Genecelle B Delossantos, Cameron E Gaskill and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Examining the impact of validated handover protocols on treatment outcomes in polytrauma patients: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Handoffs in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving Transfer of Care Between Psychiatrists and Residents: Participants' Perspective on the Implementation of a Handover Protocol in a Psychiatric Emergency.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Telemedicine for Interfacility Nurse Handoffs.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brodie ParentDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Lacey N LaGroneDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Mohamed T AlbirairDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Peter T SerinaUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Jonathan M KellerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Joseph CuschieriDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Erin J AddisonUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Lapio ChoeUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Genecelle B DelossantosUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Cameron E GaskillUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Sarah D MoonUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Jestine T MacDonaldUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Matthew J StolzbergSt Louis University School of Medicine, Surgery, St Louis, Missouri.
Erik G Van EatonDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Jennifer M ZechUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Patricia A KritekDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
University of Washington Medical Center · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Washington · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinician miscommunication contributes to an estimated 250 000 deaths in US hospitals per year. Efforts to standardize handoff communication may reduce errors and improve patient safety. Objective: To determine the effect of a standardized handoff curriculum, UW-IPASS, on interclinician communication and patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2015 to May 2016 at 8 medical and surgical intensive care units at 2 hospital systems within an academic tertiary referral center. Participants included residents, fellows, advance-practice clinicians, and attending physicians (n = 106 clinicians, with 1488 handoff events over 8 months) and data were collected from daily text message-based surveys and patient medical records. Exposures: The UW-IPASS standardized handoff curriculum. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary aim was to assess the effect of the UW-IPASS handoff curriculum on perceived adequacy of interclinician communication. Patient days of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, reintubations within 24 hours, and order workflow patterns were also analyzed. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios and confidence intervals with adjustment for location, time period, and clinician. Results: A total of 63 residents and advance practice clinicians, 13 fellows, and 30 attending physicians participated in the study. During the control period, clinicians reported being unprepared for their shift because of a poor-quality handoff in 35 of 343 handoffs (10.2%), while UW-IPASS-period residents reported being unprepared in 53 of 740 handoffs (7.2%) (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.74; P = .03). Compared with the control phase, the perceived duration of handoffs among clinicians using UW-IPASS was unchanged (+5.5 minutes; 95% CI, 0.34-9.39; P = .30). Early morning order entry decreased from 106 per 100 patient-days in the control phase to 78 per 100 patient-days in the intervention period (-28 orders; 95% CI, -55 to -4; P = .04). Overall, UW-IPASS was not associated with any changes in intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or the number of reintubations. Conclusions and Relevance: The UW-IPASS standardized handoff curriculum was perceived to improve intensive care provider preparedness and workflow. IPASS-based curricula represent an important step forward in communication standardization efforts and may help reduce communication errors and omissions. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN14209509.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPractice Patterns, Physicians'CommunicationCurriculumHumansInternship and ResidencyMedical ErrorsPatient HandoffPatient SafetySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29299602
PMCPMC5875375
OpenAlexW2781996768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.