Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299532›Full record

ArticlemSphere

Microbiota Reconstitution Does Not Cause Bone Loss in Germ-Free Mice.

Darin Quach, Fraser Collins, Narayanan Parameswaran, Laura McCabe, Robert A Britton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gut microbiome and bone health: update on mechanisms, clinical correlations, and possible treatment strategies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. JBMR plus · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gut Microbiota in Bone Health and Diabetes.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Darin QuachDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Fraser CollinsDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Narayanan ParameswaranDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Laura McCabeDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Robert A BrittonDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Geoffrey A Preidis · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
Mechanistic basis of probiotic prevention of osteoporosisR01AT007695 · NCCIH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRITTON, ROBERT A, MCCABE, LAURA R · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
The Role of the Gut and Bone Microenvironment in T1D Bone LossR01DK101050 · NIDDK · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCABE, LAURA R, PARAMESWARAN, NARAYANAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT007695NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK101050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annually, an estimated 2 million osteoporotic fractures occur in the United States alone. Osteoporosis imparts a great burden on the health care system. The identification of novel regulators of bone health is critical for developing more effective therapeutics. A previous study on the colonization of germ-free (GF) mice with a microbial community has demonstrated that bacterial colonization dramatically increases bone loss. We therefore investigated the impact of multiple microbial communities in different mice to understand how generalizable the impact of bacterial colonization is on bone health. To investigate the impact of different microbial communities on bone health in outbred and inbred mouse strains, gavage was performed on GF Swiss Webster and GF C57BL/6 mice to introduce distinct microbiotas that originated from either humans or mice. GF mice displayed a high degree of colonization, as indicated by more than 90% of the operational taxonomic units present in the starting inoculum being successfully colonized in the mice when they were examined at the end of the experiment. In spite of the successful colonization of GF mice with gut microbiota of either mouse or human origin, bone mass did not change significantly in any of the groups tested. Furthermore, static and dynamic bone parameters and osteoclast precursor and T cell populations, as well as the expression of several inflammatory markers, were mostly unchanged following microbial colonization of GF mice.

Indexed as

bonemicrobiomemicrobiotaosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29299532
PMCPMC5750390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.