Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299516›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2017

Clinical efficacy of a topical lactic acid bacterial microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Anders Mårtensson, Milad Abolhalaj, Malin Lindstedt, Anette Mårtensson, Tobias C Olofsson, Alejandra Vásquez, Lennart Greiff, Anders Cervin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07184684 (Sinonasal Microbiome Transplant as a Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07184684 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Sinonasal Microbiome Transplant as a Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS): A Randomized , Placebo Controlled Cross Over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2024 to 2031Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsArmsSinonasal microbiome transplant procedure., Placebo saline transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: A randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Emerging Therapies in the Medical Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pathogenesis of Nasal Polyposis: Current Trends.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  17. Response to intranasalFrontiers in allergy · 2023
    Article
  18. Unraveling the role of the microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anders MårtenssonDepartment of ORL Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9262-0001
Milad AbolhalajDepartment of Immunotechnology Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Malin LindstedtDepartment of Immunotechnology Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Anette MårtenssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Tobias C OlofssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Alejandra VásquezDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Lennart GreiffHelsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden; the Department of Clinical Sciences Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden.
Anders CervinDepartment of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A locally disturbed commensal microbiome might be an etiological factor in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in general and in CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) in particular. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been suggested to restore commensal microbiomes. A honeybee LAB microbiome consisting of various lactobacilli and bifidobacteria have been found potent against CRS pathogens in vitro. Recently, we examined effects of single nasal administrations of this microbiome in healthy subjects and found it inert. In this study, we examined effects of repeated such administrations in patients with CRSsNP. Study Design: The study was of a randomized, double-blinded, crossover, and sham-controlled design. Methods: Twenty patients received 2 weeks' treatment administered using a nasal spray-device. The subjects were monitored with regard to symptoms (SNOT-22 questionnaire, i.e., the primary efficacy variable), changes to their microbiome, and inflammatory products (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-, IL-8,a, and MPO) in nasal lavage fluids. Results: Neither symptom scores, microbiological explorations, nor levels of inflammatory products in nasal lavage fluids were affected by LAB (c.f. sham). Conclusion: Two weeks' nasal administration of a honeybee LAB microbiome to patients with CRSsNP is well tolerated but affects neither symptom severity nor the microbiological flora/local inflammatory activity. Level of Evidence: 1b.

Indexed as

bacterial interferencebacteriologyBifidobacteriumCRSsNPhoneyLABLactobacillusparanasal sinusesprobioticsrhinosinusitisSNOT‐22therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID29299516
PMCPMC5743165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.