Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299471›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2017

Outcomes of a newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty design in patients less than 50 years of age.

Michael A Mont, Chukwuweike Gwam, Jared M Newman, Morad Chughtai, Anton Khlopas, Prem N Ramkumar, Steven F Harwin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fixation in total knee arthroplasty: are cemented implants still mandatory in younger and obese patients?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Restricted kinematic alignment leads to uncompromised osseointegration of cementless total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A MontDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Chukwuweike GwamRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jared M NewmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Morad ChughtaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anton KhlopasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Prem N RamkumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Steven F HarwinCenter for Reconstructive Joint Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USSinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYounger patients undergoing cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be at risk for lower implant survivorship and higher revision rates due to the historical increased prevalence of aseptic loosening and instability in this cohort. The recent advances of cementless TKAs may mitigate some of these complications. However, there is a paucity of studies reporting on patients who are under 50 years who have undergone a cementless TKA. Therefore, this study evaluated: (I) implant survivorship; (II) functional outcomes and complications; and (III) radiographic outcomes in patients who were less than 50 years of age and underwent cementless TKA.

methodsA total of 29 patients (31 knees) younger than 50 years who underwent primary TKA at a single institution (Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA) from June 2008 to May 2014 were included. Their mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 2 to 6 years). The cohort included 20 women and 9 men who had a mean age of 45 years (range, 34 to 49 years), and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 33 kg/m

resultsThe overall implant survivorship was 100%; there were no failures or revision surgeries performed as of the latest follow-up visit. At the latest follow-up, the mean Knee Society pain score was 92 points (range, 80 to 95 points) and the mean Knee Society function score was 84 points (range, 70 to 90 points). Additionally, the mean knee extension was 1 degree (range, 0 to 5 degrees) and the mean knee flexion was 125 degrees (range, 95 to 140 degrees). Furthermore, at the latest follow-up, on radiographic evaluation, there was no evidence of component loosening, subsidence, radiolucency, gap formation, or reactive changes, and there were no postoperative complications.

conclusionsCementless fixation of TKAs had excellent survivorship and functional and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up in patients younger than 50 years. Although longer follow-up is needed, these cementless TKA implants appear to provide promising results in younger patient populations.

Indexed as

Cementlesscomplicationssurvivorshiptotal knee arthroplasty (TKA)young

Identifiers

PMID29299471
PMCPMC5750260
OpenAlexW2750933704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.