Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299325›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2017

Limb regeneration in a direct-developing terrestrial salamander,

Claudia Marcela Arenas Gómez, Andrea Gómez Molina, Juliana D Zapata, Jean Paul Delgado

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing the regenerative capacity and growth patterns of the Texas blind salamander (Eurycea rathbuni).Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  9. Towards comparative analyses of salamander limb regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Model organisms at the heart of regeneration.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Model systems for regeneration: salamanders.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia Marcela Arenas GómezSede de Investigación Universitaria Torre 2, Laboratorio 432, Calle 62 No. 52-59 Medellín Colombia.
Andrea Gómez MolinaSede de Investigación Universitaria Torre 2, Laboratorio 432, Calle 62 No. 52-59 Medellín Colombia.
Juliana D ZapataGrupo de Investigación en Patobiología Quiró nUniversidad de Antioquia Ciudadela Robledo, Carrera 75 # 65-87, bloque 47, oficina 134 Medellín Colombia.
Jean Paul DelgadoSede de Investigación Universitaria Torre 2, Laboratorio 432, Calle 62 No. 52-59 Medellín Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-6234
Universidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appendage regeneration is one of the most compelling phenomena in regenerative biology and is extensively studied in axolotls and newts. However, the regenerative capacity in other families of salamanders remains poorly described. Here we characterize the limb regeneration process in

Indexed as

axolotlgenome sizenewtplethodontidurodele

Identifiers

PMID29299325
PMCPMC5743783
OpenAlexW2763483644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.