Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299307›Full record

ReviewJournal of nutritional science2017

100 % Fruit juice and measures of glucose control and insulin sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Mary M Murphy, Erin C Barrett, Kara A Bresnahan, Leila M Barraj

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nutritional science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations Between Fruit Intake and Risk of Diabetes in the AusDiab Cohort.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary M MurphyExponent, Inc., Center for Chemical Regulation & Food Safety, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Erin C BarrettExponent, Inc., Center for Chemical Regulation & Food Safety, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Kara A BresnahanExponent, Inc., Center for Chemical Regulation & Food Safety, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Leila M BarrajExponent, Inc., Center for Chemical Regulation & Food Safety, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Exponent (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on the effects of consuming 100 % fruit juice on measures of glycaemic control are conflicting. The purpose of the present study was to systematically review and quantitatively summarise results from randomised controlled trials (RCT) examining effects of 100 % fruit juice on glucose-insulin homeostasis. Eligible studies were identified from a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE and hand searches of reference lists from reviews and relevant papers. Using data from eighteen RCT, meta-analyses evaluated the mean difference in fasting blood glucose (sixteen studies), fasting blood insulin (eleven studies), the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; seven studies) and glycosylated Hb (HbA1c; three studies) between the 100 % fruit juice intervention and control groups using a random-effects model. Compared with the control group, 100 % fruit juice had no significant effect on fasting blood glucose (-0·13 (95 % CI -0·28, 0·01) mmol/l;

Indexed as

100 % Fruit juiceFasting blood glucoseFasting blood insulinHbA1c, glycosylated HbHOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistanceHomeostatic model assessment of insulin resistanceInsulin sensitivityRCT, randomised controlled trialT2D, type 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29299307
PMCPMC5736636
OpenAlexW2775001943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.