Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299306›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2017

Urinary pathogenic bacterial profile, antibiogram of isolates and associated risk factors among pregnant women in Ambo town, Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Yonas Alem Gessese, Dereje Leta Damessa, Mebratenesh Mengistu Amare, Yonas Hailesilassie Bahta, Assalif Demisew Shifera, Fikreslasie Samuel Tasew, Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yonas Alem Gessese *Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Ambo University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Dereje Leta Damessa *West Shewa Health Bureau, Ambo District Health Office, Awaro Health Center, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Mebratenesh Mengistu AmareDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Ambo University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Yonas Hailesilassie BahtaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Ambo University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Assalif Demisew ShiferaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Ambo University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Fikreslasie Samuel TasewEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Endrias Zewdu GebremedhinDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Ambo University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Ambo University · ETEthiopian Public Health Institute · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a well-known bacterial infection posing serious health problem in pregnant women. A study was conducted in pregnant women with the objectives of estimating prevalence of UTI, determining antibiogram of the bacterial isolates and assessment of the potential risk factors associated with UTI. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to collect 300 mid-stream urine samples from pregnant women from March 2016 to December, 2016. Samples were inoculated into Cysteine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient medium (CLED). Colonies from CLED were subcultured onto MacConkey and Blood agar plates. A standard agar disc diffusion method was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. Chi-square Results: The age of pregnant women enrolled in this study ranges from 16 to 46 years (mean ± standard deviation = 25 ± 4.7 years).The overall prevalence of UTI in pregnant women was 18.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.4-23.54%).The prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic UTI was 20.4% (95% CI: 13.09-29.46%) and 17.8% (95% CI: 12.70-23.83%) respectively. The predominant bacteria identified were Conclusions: The prevalence & antimicrobial resistance of uropathogens was high. Health education, continuous surveillance of UTI and their antimicrobial resistance pattern are essential to reduce the consequence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria and multi-drug resistant bacteria in pregnant women.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCross-Sectional StudiesDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEthiopiaFemaleGentamicinsHumansMiddle AgedNitrofurantoinPregnancyAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneGentamicinsNitrofurantoinAntibiogramCentral EthiopiaMultidrug resistancePregnant womenPrevalenceRisk factorsUropathogens

Identifiers

PMID29299306
PMCPMC5747040
OpenAlexW2777965241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.