ArticleEcology and evolution2017
Reintroduction of the endangered and endemic plant species
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The interface between rare plant management and genetics: conserving Pitcher's thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) in the Great Lakes region, USA.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Reintroduction Without Genetic Bottlenecks: Preserving Diversity in Restored Populations of the Critically Endangered Riverine ShrubEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Spatially explicit assessment of genetic variation to inform conservation effort for an endangered Mediterranean conifer,Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Evolutionary genomics: Insights from the invasive European starlings.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Primer Binding Site (PBS) Profiling of Genetic Diversity of Natural Populations of Endemic SpeciesBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021Article
- Article
- Genetic characterization of the entire range ofPlant diversity · 2020Article
- Reintroduction of the endangered and endemic plant speciesEcology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population reintroduction is a common practice in conservation, but often fails, also due to the effects of inbreeding or outbreeding depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.