Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299246›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Toward a methodical framework for comprehensively assessing forest multifunctionality.

Stefan Trogisch, Andreas Schuldt, Jürgen Bauhus, Juliet A Blum, Sabine Both, François Buscot, Nadia Castro-Izaguirre, Douglas Chesters, Walter Durka, David Eichenberg and 41 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Challenges in Plant Eco-Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

51 authors.

Stefan TrogischInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-1012
Andreas SchuldtInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-0025
Jürgen BauhusChair of Silviculture Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Juliet A BlumInstitute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Sabine BothInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-5106
François BuscotGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Nadia Castro-IzaguirreDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Douglas ChestersInstitute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Walter DurkaGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
David EichenbergInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Alexandra ErfmeierGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Markus FischerInstitute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Christian GeißlerInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Markus S GermanyInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Philipp GoebesInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Jessica GutknechtDepartment of Soil Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany.
Christoph Zacharias HahnDepartment of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany.
Sylvia HaiderInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Werner HärdtleInstitute of Ecology Leuphana University of Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany.
Jin-Sheng HeDepartment of Ecology College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education Peking University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-3569
Andy HectorDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Lydia HönigInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Yuanyuan HuangDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Alexandra-Maria KleinNature Conservation and Landscape Ecology Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Peter KühnInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Matthias KunzInstitute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection Technische Universität Dresden Tharandt Germany.
Katrin N LeppertFaculty of Biology University of Freiburg Geobotany, Freiburg Germany.
Ying LiFaculty of Soil and Water Conservation Beijing Forestry University Haidian District Beijing China.
Xiaojuan LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Pascal A NiklausDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Zhiqin PeiDepartment of Soil Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany.
Katherina A PietschInstitute of Biology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Ricarda PrinzInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Tobias ProßInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Michael Scherer-LorenzenFaculty of Biology University of Freiburg Geobotany, Freiburg Germany.
Karsten SchmidtInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Thomas ScholtenInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Steffen SeitzInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Zhengshan SongInstitute of Geography, Soil Science and Geomorphology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany.
Michael StaabNature Conservation and Landscape Ecology Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0894-7576
Goddert von OheimbGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Christina WeißbeckerDepartment of Soil Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany.
Erik WelkInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Christian WirthGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Tesfaye WubetGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
Bo YangInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Xuefei YangKunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.
Chao-Dong ZhuInstitute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Bernhard SchmidDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-3214
Keping MaState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Helge BruelheideInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3135-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) research has extended its scope from communities that are short-lived or reshape their structure annually to structurally complex forest ecosystems. The establishment of tree diversity experiments poses specific methodological challenges for assessing the multiple functions provided by forest ecosystems. In particular, methodological inconsistencies and nonstandardized protocols impede the analysis of multifunctionality within, and comparability across the increasing number of tree diversity experiments. By providing an overview on key methods currently applied in one of the largest forest biodiversity experiments, we show how methods differing in scale and simplicity can be combined to retrieve consistent data allowing novel insights into forest ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, we discuss and develop recommendations for the integration and transferability of diverse methodical approaches to present and future forest biodiversity experiments. We identified four principles that should guide basic decisions concerning method selection for tree diversity experiments and forest BEF research: (1) method selection should be directed toward maximizing data density to increase the number of measured variables in each plot. (2) Methods should cover all relevant scales of the experiment to consider scale dependencies of biodiversity effects. (3) The same variable should be evaluated with the same method across space and time for adequate larger-scale and longer-time data analysis and to reduce errors due to changing measurement protocols. (4) Standardized, practical and rapid methods for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem functions should be promoted to increase comparability among forest BEF experiments. We demonstrate that currently available methods provide us with a sophisticated toolbox to improve a synergistic understanding of forest multifunctionality. However, these methods require further adjustment to the specific requirements of structurally complex and long-lived forest ecosystems. By applying methods connecting relevant scales, trophic levels, and above- and belowground ecosystem compartments, knowledge gain from large tree diversity experiments can be optimized.

Indexed as

BEF‐Chinaforest biodiversity experimentshigh‐throughput methodsmultitrophic interactionsstandardized protocols

Identifiers

PMID29299246
PMCPMC5743643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.