Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299219›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2017

Comparison of elbow flexor isokinetic peak torque and fatigue index between men and women of different training level.

Paulo Gentil, Mario Hebling Campos, Saulo Soares, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa, Antonio Paoli, Antonino Bianco, Martim Bottaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EJTM3 is also covering Mobility and Medicine at large, an update.European journal of translational myology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulo GentilCollege of Physical Education and Dance, University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
Mario Hebling CamposCollege of Physical Education and Dance, University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
Saulo SoaresCollege of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Gustavo De Conti Teixeira CostaCollege of Physical Education and Dance, University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil.
Antonio PaoliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Antonino BiancoSport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Martim BottaroCollege of Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Palermo · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare elbow flexion peak torque (PT) and fatigue index (FI) during isokinetic concentric contractions in men and women with different training levels. Sixty-eight young men and women were divided into four groups: resistance trained men (RTM), non-resistance trained men (NRTM), resistance trained women (RTW) and non- resistance trained women (NRTW). Participants performed two tests on an isokinetic dynamometer, one to evaluate PT and one to evaluate FI. Significant interactions were found for sex and resistance training status with both PT and FI. In general, resistance-trained subjects had higher PT, and women showed lower PT than men. PT values were 67.12 ± 9.93 N·m for RTM, 49.9 ± 8.5 N·m for NRTM, 41.84 ± 7.52 N·m for RTW, and 26.05 ± 3.34 N·m for NRTW. Separate analysis revealed that RTM had higher PT than all other groups. However, FI was higher for NRTM than for RTM and NRTW and no difference was found between RTM and NRTW. FI was 37.86 ± 10.89 % for RTW, 45.74 ± 13.17 % for NTRW, 45.89 ± 8.24 % for RTM, and 51.92 ± 4.5 % for NRTM. Women produce lower PT, and have a higher fatigue tolerance than men of similar training status. Considering that women showed to be more resistant to fatigue than men, women can manipulate training variables differently from men, such as, including more repetitions at the same relative load or using higher relative loads at the same number of repetitions.

Indexed as

Exercise PrescriptionFitnessIsokinetic DynamometerMuscle PerformanceStrength Training

Identifiers

PMID29299219
PMCPMC5745383
OpenAlexW2772524958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.