Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299094›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiology case reports2017

Endovascular retrieval of Greenfield IVC filters 13 and 19 years post placement without major complication.

Junjian Huang, Michael Bold, Mohammad Reza Rajebi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiology case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junjian HuangDepartment of Radiology, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Michael BoldDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Mohammad Reza RajebiDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were first introduced in 1967 by Kazi Mobin-Uddin and later improved by Lazar Greenfield in the 1980s becoming a major component of catastrophic pulmonary embolism prevention. Nevertheless, filters are not entirely harmless. The long term risks include caval thrombosis, visceral penetration, and filters can serve as a nidus for infection. Filter retrieval is often complicated by intimal hyperplasia especially with increased indwelling time. Historically, Greenfield filters in place for longer than 3 weeks were considered permanent due to the risks of retrieval. Herein we present 2 cases of successful retrieval of Greenfield filters 13 and 19 years post implantation.

Indexed as

AdultAnemiaDevice RemovalDuodenumEndovascular ProceduresFemaleForeign BodiesForeign-Body MigrationGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedPsoas MusclesVascular System InjuriesVena Cava FiltersEndovascularFilterIVCLoop-snareVenous

Identifiers

PMID29299094
PMCPMC5743144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.