Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298815›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Genome-Wide Characterization of DNA Methylation in an Invasive Lepidopteran Pest, the Cotton Bollworm

Christopher M Jones, Ka S Lim, Jason W Chapman, Chris Bass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methylation-associated mutagenesis underlies variation in the mutation spectrum across eukaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M JonesVector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, L3 5QA, UK chris.jones@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-6224
Ka S LimComputational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-2928
Jason W ChapmanCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9EZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-4441
Chris BassCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9EZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-1492
Rothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N012011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genes and genomes of insect pests are shaped by the wide array of selective forces encountered in their environments. While the molecular adaptations that evolve are beginning to be understood at the genomic and transcriptomic level, they have been less well characterized at an epigenetic level. Here, we present a genome-wide map of DNA methylation at single-nucleotide resolution for the cotton bollworm moth,

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenome, InsectGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticFlight, AnimalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGossypiumMass SpectrometryMothsPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptomecytosine methylationepigeneticsflight activitygene expressionphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID29298815
PMCPMC5844299
OpenAlexW2782394418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.