ArticleMicrobiome2018
Grapevine rootstocks shape underground bacterial microbiome and networking but not potential functionality.
Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- Region-associated microbial signatures persist during inoculated fermentation of Nebbiolo grapes.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Microbial terroir in winegrowing: revisiting the role of microbial biogeography in terroir expression.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Review
- Borborobacter xinjiangensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from grapevine rootstock in Xinjiang, China.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Influence of Environment and Rootstock On the Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities in Four Vineyards of the Douro Demarcated Region.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Apple replant disease resistance in different apple rootstocks evaluated using microbiomic and metabolomic analyses.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Pear scion genotypes shape rhizosphere fungal communities in association with photosynthetic sugar metabolism.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Grape expectations: disentangling environmental drivers of microbiome establishment in winegrowing ecosystems.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Spatial heterogeneity and microbial terroir: balancing dispersal limitation and cultivar as drivers of microbial diversity in viticulture.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Graft compatibility emerges from the balance between regeneration and immunity: lessons from plant-plant interactions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Grapevine phyllosphere pan-metagenomics reveals pan-microbiome structure, diversity, and functional roles in downy mildew resistance.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Mycorrhizae and grapevines: the known unknowns of their interaction for wine growers' challenges.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Rhizobacteria from vineyard and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce synergistic microbiome shifts within grapevine root systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A tale of two vineyards: parsing site-specific differences in bacterial and fungal communities of wine grapes from proximal vineyards and their changes during processing in a single winery.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Endophytic Diversity inBiology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Grapevine Microbiome: Insights into the Microbial Ecosystem of Grape Berries.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Assembly and network ofChinese herbal medicines · 2025Article
- Beyond correlation: Understanding the causal link between microbiome and plant health.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Zonation of the Vitis vinifera microbiome in Vino Nobile di Montepulciano PDO production area.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Exploring the role of grafting in abiotic stress management: Contemporary insights and automation trends.Plant direct · 2024Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe plant compartments of Vitis vinifera, including the rhizosphere, rhizoplane, root endosphere, phyllosphere and carposphere, provide unique niches that drive specific bacterial microbiome associations. The majority of phyllosphere endophytes originate from the soil and migrate up to the aerial compartments through the root endosphere. Thus, the soil and root endosphere partially define the aerial endosphere in the leaves and berries, contributing to the terroir of the fruit. However, V. vinifera cultivars are invariably grafted onto the rootstocks of other Vitis species and hybrids. It has been hypothesized that the plant species determines the microbiome of the root endosphere and, as a consequence, the aerial endosphere. In this work, we test the first part of this hypothesis. We investigate whether different rootstocks influence the bacteria selected from the surrounding soil, affecting the bacterial diversity and potential functionality of the rhizosphere and root endosphere.
methodsBacterial microbiomes from both the root tissues and the rhizosphere of Barbera cultivars, both ungrafted and grafted on four different rootstocks, cultivated in the same soil from the same vineyard, were characterized by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. To assess the influence of the root genotype on the bacterial communities' recruitment in the root system, (i) the phylogenetic diversity coupled with the predicted functional profiles and (ii) the co-occurrence bacterial networks were determined. Cultivation-dependent approaches were used to reveal the plant-growth promoting (PGP) potential associated with the grafted and ungrafted root systems.
resultsRichness, diversity and bacterial community networking in the root compartments were significantly influenced by the rootstocks. Complementary to a shared bacterial microbiome, different subsets of soil bacteria, including those endowed with PGP traits, were selected by the root system compartments of different rootstocks. The interaction between the root compartments and the rootstock exerted a unique selective pressure that enhanced niche differentiation, but rootstock-specific bacterial communities were still recruited with conserved PGP traits.
conclusionWhile the rootstock significantly influences the taxonomy, structure and network properties of the bacterial community in grapevine roots, a homeostatic effect on the distribution of the predicted and potential functional PGP traits was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.