Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298712›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Co-infections with multiple genotypes of Anaplasma marginale in cattle indicate pathogen diversity.

Paidashe Hove, Mamohale E Chaisi, Kelly A Brayton, Hamilton Ganesan, Helen N Catanese, Moses S Mtshali, Awelani M Mutshembele, Marinda C Oosthuizen, Nicola E Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Transovarial Transmission ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Temporal Dynamics ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Unravelling the diversity ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on tick-borne pathogen co-infections.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paidashe HoveVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mamohale E ChaisiVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Kelly A BraytonVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Hamilton GanesanInqaba Biotechnical Industries, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.
Helen N CataneseSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Moses S MtshaliResearch and Scientific Services Department, National Zoological Gardens of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Awelani M MutshembeleResearch and Scientific Services Department, National Zoological Gardens of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Marinda C OosthuizenVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Nicola E CollinsVectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. nicola.collins@up.ac.za.

Funding

National Research Foundation (South Africa) 81840Technology Innovation Agency, Tshwane Animal Health Cluster (TIA,TAHC), South Africa TAHC12-00037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly a few studies have examined the presence of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in South Africa, and no studies have comprehensively examined these species across the whole country. To undertake this country-wide study we adapted a duplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for use in South Africa but found that one of the genes on which the assay was based was variable. Therefore, we sequenced a variety of field samples and tested the assay on the variants detected. We used the assay to screen 517 cattle samples sourced from all nine provinces of South Africa, and subsequently examined A. marginale positive samples for msp1α genotype to gauge strain diversity.

resultsAlthough the A. marginale msp1β gene is variable, the qPCR functions at an acceptable efficiency. The A. centrale groEL gene was not variable within the qPCR assay region. Of the cattle samples screened using the assay, 57% and 17% were found to be positive for A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively. Approximately 15% of the cattle were co-infected. Msp1α genotyping revealed 36 novel repeat sequences. Together with data from previous studies, we analysed the Msp1a repeats from South Africa where a total of 99 repeats have been described that can be attributed to 190 msp1α genotypes. While 22% of these repeats are also found in other countries, only two South African genotypes are also found in other countries; otherwise, the genotypes are unique to South Africa.

conclusionsAnaplasma marginale was prevalent in the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga and absent in the Northern Cape. Anaplasma centrale was prevalent in the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal and absent in the Northern Cape and Eastern Cape. None of the cattle in the study were known to be vaccinated with A. centrale, so finding positive cattle indicates that this organism appears to be naturally circulating in cattle. A diverse population of A. marginale strains are found in South Africa, with some msp1α genotypes widely distributed across the country, and others appearing only once in one province. This diversity should be taken into account in future vaccine development studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenotypeAnaplasma centraleAnaplasma marginaleAnaplasmosisAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCattleCattle DiseasesChaperonin 60CoinfectionMolecular EpidemiologyMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSouth AfricaBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsChaperonin 60major surface protein 1a, AnaplasmagroELmsp1αmsp1βNext-generation amplicon sequencingqPCR

Identifiers

PMID29298712
PMCPMC5753507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.