Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298682›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Sidedness and TP53 mutations impact OS in anti-EGFR but not anti-VEGF treated mCRC - an analysis of the KRAS registry of the AGMT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie).

Florian Huemer, Josef Thaler, Gudrun Piringer, Hubert Hackl, Lisa Pleyer, Clemens Hufnagl, Lukas Weiss, Richard Greil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association ofGenetics research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinct Driver Pathway Enrichments and a High Prevalence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementing precision oncology for sarcoma patients: the CCCJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Florian HuemerIIIrd Medical Department with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Josef ThalerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Gudrun PiringerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Hubert HacklDivision of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lisa PleyerIIIrd Medical Department with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Clemens HufnaglIIIrd Medical Department with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas WeissIIIrd Medical Department with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Richard GreilIIIrd Medical Department with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. r.greil@salk.at.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATUniversity of Salzburg · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the localization of the primary tumour has been shown to be of prognostic as well as predictive relevance.

methodsWith the aim to investigate clinical and molecular disease characteristics with respect to sidedness in a real-world cohort, we analyzed 161 mCRC patients included in the KRAS Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie (AGMT) between January 2006 and October 2013.

resultsRight-sided mCRC displayed a worse median overall survival (OS) in comparison to left-sided disease (18.1 months [95%-CI: 14.3-40.7] versus 32.3 months [95%-CI: 25.5-38.6]; HR: 1.63 [95%-CI: 1.13-2.84]; p = 0.013). The choice of the biological agent in front-line therapy had a statistically significant impact on median OS in patients with right-sided tumours (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): 10.6 months [95%-CI: 5.2-NA]; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): 26.2 months [95%-CI: 17.9-NA]; HR: 2.69 [95%-CI: 1.30-12.28]; p = 0.015) but not in patients with left-sided tumours (anti-EGFR: 37.0 months [95%-CI: 20.2-56.6]; anti-VEGF: 32.3 months [95%-CI: 23.6-41.1]; HR: 0.97 [95%-CI: 0.56-1.66]; p = 0.905). When evaluating molecular characteristics of tumour samples, we found a clinically meaningful trend towards an inferior OS in TP53 mutant mCRC treated with anti-EGFR based therapy compared to anti-VEGF based therapy (17.1 months [95%-CI: 8.7-NA] versus 38.3 months [95%-CI: 23.6-48.0], HR = 1.95 [95%-CI: 0.95-5.88]; p = 0.066), which was not significantly dependent on sidedness. This was not the case in patients with TP53 wild-type tumours. Therefore we evaluated the combined impact of sidedness and TP53 mutation status in the anti-EGFR treated cohort and patients with left-sided/TP53 wild-type mCRC showed the longest median OS (38.9 months) of all groups (right-sided/TP53 mutant: 12.1 months; right-sided/TP53 wild-type: 8.9 months; left-sided/TP53 mutant: 18.4 months; p = 0.020).

conclusionsTP53 mutation and right-sidedness are associated with shorter OS in patients treated with anti-EGFR based therapy but not with anti-VEGF based therapy. The confirmation of the predictive value of TP53 mutation status in a larger cohort is warranted.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanAnti-EGFRAnti-VEGFBevacizumabCetuximabColorectal cancerKRASPanitumumabPredictive valueSidednessTP53

Identifiers

PMID29298682
PMCPMC5753540
OpenAlexW2782065735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.