Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298672›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

No association between ACTN3 R577X and ACE I/D polymorphisms and endurance running times in 698 Caucasian athletes.

Ioannis D Papadimitriou, Sarah J Lockey, Sarah Voisin, Adam J Herbert, Fleur Garton, Peter J Houweling, Pawel Cieszczyk, Agnieszka Maciejewska-Skrendo, Marek Sawczuk, Myosotis Massidda and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Genes and Elite Marathon Running Performance: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Association betweenFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  19. The genetics of human performance.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Ioannis D PapadimitriouInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah J LockeySports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Sarah VoisinInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
Adam J HerbertSports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Fleur GartonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Peter J HouwelingMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Pawel CieszczykFaculty of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Agnieszka Maciejewska-SkrendoFaculty of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Marek SawczukFaculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland.
Myosotis MassiddaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Carla Maria CalòDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Irina V AstratenkovaSports Genetics Laboratory, St Petersburg Research Institute of Physical Culture, St Petersburg, Russia.
Anastasia KouvatsiDepartment of Genetics Development and Molecular Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anastasiya M DruzhevskayaSports Genetics Laboratory, St Petersburg Research Institute of Physical Culture, St Petersburg, Russia.
Macsue JacquesInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
Ildus I AhmetovSports Genetics Laboratory, St Petersburg Research Institute of Physical Culture, St Petersburg, Russia.
Georgina K StebbingsSports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Shane HeffernanSports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Stephen H DaySports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Robert ErskineResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Charles PedlarSchool of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University College, Twickenham, UK.
Courtney KippsInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Kathryn N NorthMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Alun G WilliamsSports Genomics Laboratory, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, UK.
Nir EynonInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Victoria, Australia. nir.eynon@vu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies investigating associations between ACTN3 R577X and ACE I/D genotypes and endurance athletic status have been limited by small sample sizes from mixed sport disciplines and lack quantitative measures of performance.

aimTo examine the association between ACTN3 R577X and ACE I/D genotypes and best personal running times in a large homogeneous cohort of endurance runners.

methodsWe collected a total of 1064 personal best 1500, 3000, 5000 m and marathon running times of 698 male and female Caucasian endurance athletes from six countries (Australia, Greece, Italy, Poland, Russia and UK). Athletes were genotyped for ACTN3 R577X and ACE ID variants.

resultsThere was no association between ACTN3 R577X or ACE I/D genotype and running performance at any distance in men or women. Mean (SD) marathon times (in s) were for men: ACTN3 RR 9149 (593), RX 9221 (582), XX 9129 (582) p = 0.94; ACE DD 9182 (665), ID 9214 (549), II 9155 (492) p = 0.85; for women: ACTN3 RR 10796 (818), RX 10667 (695), XX 10675 (553) p = 0.36; ACE DD 10604 (561), ID 10766 (740), II 10771 (708) p = 0.21. Furthermore, there were no associations between these variants and running time for any distance in a sub-analysis of athletes with personal records within 20% of world records.

conclusionsThus, consistent with most case-control studies, this multi-cohort quantitative analysis demonstrates it is unlikely that ACTN3 XX genotype provides an advantage in competitive endurance running performance. For ACE II genotype, some prior studies show an association but others do not. Our data indicate it is also unlikely that ACE II genotype provides an advantage in endurance running.

Indexed as

AthletesPolymorphism, GeneticActininFemaleGenotypeHumansMalePeptidyl-Dipeptidase APhysical EnduranceRunningWhite PeopleActininACTN3 protein, humanPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AACEACTN3Athletic performanceChampionsEnduranceGenomics

Identifiers

PMID29298672
PMCPMC5753575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.