Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298666›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.

Peng Guo, Bo Zhu, Hong Niu, Zezhao Wang, Yonghu Liang, Yan Chen, Lupei Zhang, Hemin Ni, Yong Guo, El Hamidi A Hay and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Peng GuoLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bo ZhuLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hong NiuLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zezhao WangLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yonghu LiangLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yan ChenLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Lupei ZhangLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hemin NiAnimal Science and Technology College, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, China.
Yong GuoAnimal Science and Technology College, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, China.
El Hamidi A HayLivestock and Range Research Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Miles City, MT, USA.
Xue GaoLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huijiang GaoLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaolin WuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, GeneSeek (A Neogen company), Lincoln, NE, 68504, USA.
Lingyang XuLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China. xulingyang@caas.cn.
Junya LiLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Bovine Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China. jl1@iascaas.net.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRunning multiple-chain Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) provides an efficient parallel computing method for complex Bayesian models, although the efficiency of the approach critically depends on the length of the non-parallelizable burn-in period, for which all simulated data are discarded. In practice, this burn-in period is set arbitrarily and often leads to the performance of far more iterations than required. In addition, the accuracy of genomic predictions does not improve after the MCMC reaches equilibrium.

resultsAutomatic tuning of the burn-in length for running multiple-chain MCMC was proposed in the context of genomic predictions using BayesA and BayesCπ models. The performance of parallel computing versus sequential computing and tunable burn-in MCMC versus fixed burn-in MCMC was assessed using simulation data sets as well by applying these methods to genomic predictions of a Chinese Simmental beef cattle population. The results showed that tunable burn-in parallel MCMC had greater speedups than fixed burn-in parallel MCMC, and both had greater speedups relative to sequential (single-chain) MCMC. Nevertheless, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and genomic prediction accuracies were highly comparable between the various computing approaches. When applied to the genomic predictions of four quantitative traits in a Chinese Simmental population of 1217 beef cattle genotyped by an Illumina Bovine 770 K SNP BeadChip, tunable burn-in multiple-chain BayesCπ (TBM-BayesCπ) outperformed tunable burn-in multiple-chain BayesCπ (TBM-BayesA) and Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) in terms of the prediction accuracy, although the differences were not necessarily caused by computational factors and could have been intrinsic to the statistical models per se.

conclusionsAutomatically tunable burn-in multiple-chain MCMC provides an accurate and cost-effective tool for high-performance computing of Bayesian genomic prediction models, and this algorithm is generally applicable to high-performance computing of any complex Bayesian statistical model.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleChinaMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayesian modelsConvergence diagnosisGenomic predictionHigh-performance computingTunable burn-in

Identifiers

PMID29298666
PMCPMC5751823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.