ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2018
YidC: Evaluating the Importance of the Native Environment.
Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment onCombined2018
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this issue of Structure, Baker et al. (2018) take advantage of recent technological breakthroughs in solid-state NMR spectroscopy and electron cryogenic tomography to characterize structural and functional differences between reconstituted YidC in E. coli lipids and YidC as overexpressed in the E. coli inner cellular membrane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29298411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.