ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2018
A Miniature Swine Model for Stem Cell-Based De Novo Regeneration of Dental Pulp and Dentin-Like Tissue.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical Signaling in the Microenvironment Regulates the Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Novel Strategy For Pulp-Dentin Complex Regeneration.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Dual-engineered extracellular vesicles enabling endothelial targeting and EphrinB2 delivery for pulp revascularization.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Advanced biomimetic mineralization approaches for enamel and dentin regeneration: a review.Odontology · 2026Review
- Advances in oral disease models: a mini-review of developments from 2015 to 2025.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Regenerative Dentistry: Applications of Bioactive Materials in Dentin-Pulp Complex.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- An In Vitro Tube Model for Cell Biocompatibility Study of Capping Materials for Regenerative Endodontics.Journal of endodontics · 2025Article
- The comprehensive progress of tooth regeneration from the tooth development to tissue engineering and clinical application.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025Review
- Regenerative endodontic therapy: From laboratory bench to clinical practice.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- How to Deal with Pulpitis: An Overview of New Approaches.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- In Vivo and In Vitro Response to a Regenerative Dental Scaffold.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dental pulp regeneration strategies: A review of status quo and recent advances.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Research progress of dental pulp regeneration treatment.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Neovascularization by DPSC-ECs in a Tube Model for Pulp Regeneration Study.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
- Bioactive ceramic-based materials: beneficial properties and potential applications in dental repair and regeneration.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-based Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine of Dental Diseases.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Recent advancement in vascularized tissue-engineered bone based on materials design and modification.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cell exosomes enhance dental pulp cell functions and promote pulp-dentin regeneration.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2023Article
- Epigenetic therapeutics in dental pulp treatment: Hopes, challenges and concerns for the development of next-generation biomaterials.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- 3D Organoids for Regenerative Endodontics.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Epithelium-derived SCUBE3 promotes polarized odontoblastic differentiation of dental mesenchymal stem cells and pulp regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to establish mini-swine as a large animal model for stem cell-based pulp regeneration studies. Swine dental pulp stem cells (sDPSCs) were isolated from mini-swine and characterized in vitro. For in vivo studies, we first employed both ectopic and semi-orthotopic study models using severe combined immunodeficiency mice. One is hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) model for pulp-dentin complex formation, and the other is tooth fragment model for complete pulp regeneration with new dentin depositing along the canal walls. We found that sDPSCs are similar to their human counterparts exhibiting mesenchymal stem cell characteristics with ability to form colony forming unit-fibroblastic and odontogenic differentiation potential. sDPSCs formed pulp-dentin complex in the HA/TCP model and showed pulp regeneration capacity in the tooth fragment model. We then tested orthotopic pulp regeneration on mini-swine including the use of multi-rooted teeth. Using autologous sDPSCs carried by hydrogel and transplanted into the mini-swine root canal space, we observed regeneration of vascularized pulp-like tissue with a layer of newly deposited dentin-like (rD) tissue or osteodentin along the canal walls. In some cases, dentin bridge-like structure was observed. Immunohistochemical analysis detected the expression of nestin, dentin sialophosphoprotein, dentin matrix protein 1, and bone sialoprotein in odontoblast-like cells lining against the produced rD. We also tested the use of allogeneic sDPSCs for the same procedures. Similar findings were observed in allogeneic transplantation. This study is the first to show an establishment of mini-swine as a suitable large animal model utilizing multi-rooted teeth for further cell-based pulp regeneration studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.