Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29298306›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

DNA recovery from wild chimpanzee tools.

Fiona A Stewart, Alexander K Piel, Lydia Luncz, Joanna Osborn, Yingying Li, Beatrice H Hahn, Michael Haslam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona A StewartSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4929-4711
Alexander K PielSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lydia LunczPrimate Archaeology Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joanna OsbornDepartment of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Yingying LiDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Beatrice H HahnDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michael HaslamPrimate Archaeology Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USLiverpool John Moores University · GB

Funding

Natural SIV Reservoirs and Human Zoonotic RiskR37AI050529 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAHN, BEATRICE H · 2008 to 2017
$5.7M
Studies of the precursor of the human AIDS virus in its natural chimpanzee hostR01AI120810 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAHN, BEATRICE H · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120810NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI050529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of our knowledge of wild chimpanzee behaviour stems from fewer than 10 long-term field sites. This bias limits studies to a potentially unrepresentative set of communities known to show great behavioural diversity on small geographic scales. Here, we introduce a new genetic approach to bridge the gap between behavioural material evidence in unhabituated chimpanzees and genetic advances in the field of primatology. The use of DNA analyses has revolutionised archaeological and primatological fields, whereby extraction of DNA from non-invasively collected samples allows researchers to reconstruct behaviour without ever directly observing individuals. We used commercially available forensic DNA kits to show that termite-fishing by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) leaves behind detectable chimpanzee DNA evidence on tools. We then quantified the recovered DNA, compared the yield to that from faecal samples, and performed an initial assessment of mitochondrial and microsatellite markers to identify individuals. From 49 termite-fishing tools from the Issa Valley research site in western Tanzania, we recovered an average of 52 pg/μl chimpanzee DNA, compared to 376.2 pg/μl in faecal DNA extracts. Mitochondrial DNA haplotypes could be assigned to 41 of 49 tools (84%). Twenty-six tool DNA extracts yielded >25 pg/μl DNA and were selected for microsatellite analyses; genotypes were determined with confidence for 18 tools. These tools were used by a minimum of 11 individuals across the study period and termite mounds. These results demonstrate the utility of bio-molecular techniques and a primate archaeology approach in non-invasive monitoring and behavioural reconstruction of unhabituated primate populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAPan troglodytesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTanzaniaDNA

Identifiers

PMID29298306
PMCPMC5751987
OpenAlexW2781728793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.