ArticlePloS one2018
Biomarkers for tissue engineering of the tendon-bone interface.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicellular microtissues from fused ligament- and bone-cell spheroids relevant to enthesis repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Paracrine signals influence patterns of fibrocartilage differentiation in a lyophilized gelatin hydrogel for applications in rotator cuff repair.Biomaterials science · 2024Article
- Downregulation of SOX9 expression in developing entheses adjacent to intramembranous bone.PloS one · 2024Article
- Spatial Configurations of 3D Extracellular Matrix Collagen Density and Anisotropy Simultaneously Guide Angiogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Biomimetic Approaches for the Design and Fabrication of Bone-to-Soft Tissue Interfaces.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Development of three-layer collagen scaffolds to spatially direct tissue-specific cell differentiation for enthesis repair.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Multiparity and Aging Impact Chondrogenic and Osteogenic Potential at Symphyseal Enthesis: New Insights into Interpubic Joint Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Tendon and multiomics: advantages, advances, and opportunities.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Biomimetic strategies for tendon/ligament-to-bone interface regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Tissue Engineering for the Insertions of Tendons and Ligaments: An Overview of Electrospun Biomaterials and Structures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Nanofiber Scaffolds by Electrospinning for Rotator Cuff Tissue Engineering.Chonnam medical journal · 2021Review
- Comparative Analysis of the Extracellular Matrix Proteome across the Myotendinous Junction.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Biochemical characteristics of the chondrocyte-enriched SNORC protein and its transcriptional regulation by SOX9.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The genetic profile of elite youth soccer players and its association with power and speed depends on maturity status.PloS one · 2020Article
- No healing improvement after rotator cuff reconstruction augmented with an autologous periosteal flap.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tendon-bone interface (enthesis) is a highly sophisticated biomaterial junction that allows stress transfer between mechanically dissimilar materials. The enthesis encounters very high mechanical demands and the regenerative capacity is very low resulting in high rupture recurrence rates after surgery. Tissue engineering offers the potential to recover the functional integrity of entheses. However, recent enthesis tissue engineering approaches have been limited by the lack of knowledge about the cells present at this interface. Here we investigated the cellular differentiation of enthesis cells and compared the cellular pattern of enthesis cells to tendon and cartilage cells in a next generation sequencing transcriptome study. We integrated the transcriptome data with proteome data of a previous study to identify biomarkers of enthesis cell differentiation. Transcriptomics detected 34468 transcripts in total in enthesis, tendon, and cartilage. Transcriptome comparisons revealed 3980 differentially regulated candidates for enthesis and tendon, 395 for enthesis and cartilage, and 946 for cartilage and tendon. An asymmetric distribution of enriched genes was observed in enthesis and cartilage transcriptome comparison suggesting that enthesis cells are more chondrocyte-like than tenocyte-like. Integrative analysis of transcriptome and proteome data identified ten enthesis biomarkers and six tendon biomarkers. The observed gene expression characteristics and differentiation markers shed light into the nature of the cells present at the enthesis. The presented markers will foster enthesis tissue engineering approaches by setting a bench-mark for differentiation of seeded cells towards a physiologically relevant phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.