Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297385›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2017

Tailoring nutrition therapy to illness and recovery.

Paul E Wischmeyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03724045 (Back Side of the Moon Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03724045 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Back Side of the Moon Study: What is the Efficiency of Nutritional Therapy (Calories and Nitrogen) in ICU and on the Ward and What is the Metabolic Profile of Patients After ICU? Could Supplemental Nutrition Fill the Gap?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2019 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsNutritional Deficiency, HospitalismArmsBack Side of the Moon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul E WischmeyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Paul.wischmeyer@duke.edu.
Clinical Research Institute · US

Funding

Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition to Reduce Death in Malnourished ICU PatientsR34HL109369 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HEYLAND, DAREN KEITH, WISCHMEYER, PAUL E · 2012 to 2014
$568k
NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL109369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Without doubt, in medicine as in life, one size does not fit all. We do not administer the same drug or dose to every patient at all times, so why then would we live under the illusion that we should give the same nutrition at all times in the continuum of critical illness? We have long lived under the assumption that critical illness and trauma lead to a consistent early increase in metabolic/caloric need, the so-called "hypermetabolism" of critical illness. What if this is incorrect? Recent data indicate that early underfeeding of calories (trophic feeding) may have benefits and may require consideration in well-nourished patients. However, we must confront the reality that currently ICU nutrition delivery worldwide is actually leading to "starvation" of our patients and is likely a major contributor to poor long-term quality of life outcomes. To begin to ascertain the actual calorie and protein delivery required for optimal ICU recovery, an understanding of "starvation" and recovery from starvation and lean body mass (LBM) loss is needed. To begin to answer this question, we must look to the landmark Minnesota Starvation Study from 1945. This trial defines much of the world's knowledge about starvation, and most importantly what is required for recovery from starvation and massive LBM loss as occurs in the ICU. Recent and historic data indicate that critical illness is characterized by early massive catabolism, LBM loss, and escalating hypermetabolism that can persist for months or years. Early enteral nutrition during the acute phase should attempt to correct micronutrient/vitamin deficiencies, deliver adequate protein, and moderate nonprotein calories in well-nourished patients, as in the acute phase they are capable of generating significant endogenous energy. Post resuscitation, increasing protein (1.5-2.0 g/kg/day) and calories are needed to attenuate LBM loss and promote recovery. Malnutrition screening is essential and parenteral nutrition can be safely added following resuscitation when enteral nutrition is failing based on pre-illness malnutrition and LBM status. Following the ICU stay, significant protein/calorie delivery for months or years is required to facilitate functional and LBM recovery, with high-protein oral supplements being essential to achieve adequate nutrition.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusCritical IllnessFatigueHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMuscle StrengthNutritional SupportPrecision MedicineResearch DesignWarfareWorld War IICaloriesCritical careICULean body massMalnutritionMuscleProteinQuality of lifeRecovery

Identifiers

PMID29297385
PMCPMC5751603
OpenAlexW2779720126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.