Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297351›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2017

Probability-based collaborative filtering model for predicting gene-disease associations.

Xiangxiang Zeng, Ningxiang Ding, Alfonso Rodríguez-Patón, Quan Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Network-Based Drug Prediction in Thyroid Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiangxiang ZengDepartment of Computer Science, School of information science and technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ningxiang DingDepartment of Computer Science, School of information science and technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Alfonso Rodríguez-PatónDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Quan ZouSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. zouquan@nclab.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately predicting pathogenic human genes has been challenging in recent research. Considering extensive gene-disease data verified by biological experiments, we can apply computational methods to perform accurate predictions with reduced time and expenses.

methodsWe propose a probability-based collaborative filtering model (PCFM) to predict pathogenic human genes. Several kinds of data sets, containing data of humans and data of other nonhuman species, are integrated in our model. Firstly, on the basis of a typical latent factorization model, we propose model I with an average heterogeneous regularization. Secondly, we develop modified model II with personal heterogeneous regularization to enhance the accuracy of aforementioned models. In this model, vector space similarity or Pearson correlation coefficient metrics and data on related species are also used.

resultsWe compared the results of PCFM with the results of four state-of-arts approaches. The results show that PCFM performs better than other advanced approaches.

conclusionsPCFM model can be leveraged for predictions of disease genes, especially for new human genes or diseases with no known relationships.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputational BiologyDiseaseHumansProbabilityBiological networkGene–disease association predictionHeterogeneous similarity regularizationLatent factor model

Identifiers

PMID29297351
PMCPMC5751590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.