Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297326›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

Advantages of Amplifluor-like SNP markers over KASP in plant genotyping.

Satyvaldy Jatayev, Akhylbek Kurishbayev, Lyudmila Zotova, Gulmira Khasanova, Dauren Serikbay, Askar Zhubatkanov, Makpal Botayeva, Aibek Zhumalin, Arysgul Turbekova, Kathleen Soole and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Assay for Variable Fragment Length Allele-Specific Genotyping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of genetic diversity among olive trees (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Chile Pepper (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  8. Expression of Specific Alleles of Zinc-Finger Transcription Factors,International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Appraisal of wheat genomics for gene discovery and breeding applications: a special emphasis on advances in Asia.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  17. Intracellular Vesicle Trafficking Genes,Frontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The General Transcription RepressorFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Satyvaldy JatayevFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Akhylbek KurishbayevFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Lyudmila ZotovaFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Gulmira KhasanovaFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Dauren SerikbayFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Askar ZhubatkanovFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Makpal BotayevaFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Aibek ZhumalinFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Arysgul TurbekovaFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Kathleen SooleSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Peter LangridgeSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, SA, Australia.
Yuri ShavrukovSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia. yuri.shavrukov@flinders.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKASP (KBioscience Competitive Allele Specific PCR) and Amplifluor (Amplification with fluorescence) SNP markers are two prominent technologies based upon a shared identical Allele-specific PCR platform.

methodsAmplifluor-like SNP and KASP analysis was carried out using published and own design of Universal probes (UPs) and Gene-specific primers (GSPs).

resultsAdvantages of the Amplifluor-like system over KASP include the significantly lower costs and much greater flexibility in the adjustment and development of 'self-designed' dual fluorescently-labelled UPs and regular GSPs. The presented results include optimisation of 'tail' length in UPs and GSPs, protocol adjustment, and the use of various fluorophores in different qPCR instruments. The compatibility of the KASP Master-mix in both original and Amplifluor-like systems has been demonstrated in the presented results, proving their similar principles. Results of SNP scoring with rare alleles in addition to more frequently occurring alleles are shown.

conclusionsThe Amplifluor-like system produces SNP genotyping results with a level of sensitivity and accuracy comparable to KASP but at a significantly cheaper cost and with much greater flexibility for UPs with self-designed GSPs.

Indexed as

AllelesGenetic MarkersGenotyping TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlantsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsGenetic MarkersAmplifluorGene-specific primersKASPSingle nucleotide polymorphismSNP markersUniversal probes

Identifiers

PMID29297326
PMCPMC5751575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.