Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297323›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Mentorship and coaching to support strengthening healthcare systems: lessons learned across the five Population Health Implementation and Training partnership projects in sub-Saharan Africa.

Anatole Manzi, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Kenneth Sherr, Cindy Chirwa, Colin Baynes, John Koku Awoonor-Williams, AHI PHIT Partnership Collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anatole ManziPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda. mangano2020@gmail.com.
Lisa R HirschhornPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kenneth SherrDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cindy ChirwaPrimary Care and Health Systems Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research, Lusaka, Zambia.
Colin BaynesHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
John Koku Awoonor-WilliamsPolicy, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
AHI PHIT Partnership Collaborative

Funding

HEALTH SYSTEMS STRENGTHENING TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES: APPLYING IMPLEMENTATIONK02TW009207 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHERR, KENNETH · 2011 to 2015
$403k
FIC NIH HHS K02 TW009207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite global efforts to increase health workforce capacity through training and guidelines, challenges remain in bridging the gap between knowledge and quality clinical practice and addressing health system deficiencies preventing health workers from providing high quality care. In many developing countries, supervision activities focus on data collection, auditing and report completion rather than catalyzing learning and supporting system quality improvement. To address this gap, mentorship and coaching interventions were implemented in projects in five African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) as components of health systems strengthening (HSS) strategies funded through the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's African Health Initiative. We report on lessons learned from a cross-country evaluation.

methodsThe evaluation was designed based on a conceptual model derived from the project-specific interventions. Semi-structured interviews were administered to key informants to capture data in six categories: 1) mentorship and coaching goals, 2) selection and training of mentors and coaches, 3) integration with the existing systems, 4) monitoring and evaluation, 5) reported outcomes, and 6) challenges and successes. A review of project-published articles and technical reports from the individual projects supplemented interview information.

resultsAlthough there was heterogeneity in the approaches to mentorship and coaching and targeted areas of the country projects, all led to improvements in core health system areas, including quality of clinical care, data-driven decision making, leadership and accountability, and staff satisfaction. Adaptation of approaches to reflect local context encouraged their adoption and improved their effectiveness and sustainability.

conclusionWe found that incorporating mentorship and coaching activities into HSS strategies was associated with improvements in quality of care and health systems, and mentorship and coaching represents an important component of HSS activities designed to improve not just coverage, but even further effective coverage, in achieving Universal Health Care.

Indexed as

MentoringDelivery of Health CareGhanaHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHumansMozambiqueQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareRwandaTanzaniaZambiaCoachingGhanaMentorshipMozambiqueQuality improvementRwandaTanzaniaZambia

Identifiers

PMID29297323
PMCPMC5763487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.