ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
ALE: automated label extraction from GEO metadata.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylation array signals are predictive of chronological age without bisulfite conversion.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Using semantic search to find publicly available gene-expression datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- ProtGO: universal protein function prediction utilizing multi-modal gene ontology knowledge.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Public Omics Explorer (POE): Enabling integrative semantic search across GEO omics datasets based on PubMed publications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- RummaGEO: Automatic mining of human and mouse gene sets from GEO.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Dataset including whole blood gene expression profiles and matched leukocyte counts with utility for benchmarking cellular deconvolution pipelines.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- RummaGEO: Automatic Mining of Human and Mouse Gene Sets from GEO.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- BioVDB: biological vector database for high-throughput gene expression meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Donor white blood cell differential is the single largest determinant of whole blood gene expression patterns.Genomics · 2023Article
- Processing genome-wide association studies within a repository of heterogeneous genomic datasets.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Article
- GeMI: interactive interface for transformer-based Genomic Metadata Integration.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Many chronological aging clocks can be found throughout the epigenome: Implications for quantifying biological aging.Aging cell · 2021Article
- Large-scale labeling and assessment of sex bias in publicly available expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- GAUGE-Annotated Microbial Transcriptomic Data Facilitate Parallel Mining and High-Throughput Reanalysis To Form Data-Driven Hypotheses.mSystems · 2021Article
- GEOlimma: differential expression analysis and feature selection using pre-existing microarray data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Quiescent stem cell marker genes in glioma gene networks are sufficient to distinguish between normal and glioblastoma (GBM) samples.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mining data and metadata from the gene expression omnibus.Biophysical reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a rich community resource containing millions of gene expression experiments from human, mouse, rat, and other model organisms. However, information about each experiment (metadata) is in the format of an open-ended, non-standardized textual description provided by the depositor. Thus, classification of experiments for meta-analysis by factors such as gender, age of the sample donor, and tissue of origin is not feasible without assigning labels to the experiments. Automated approaches are preferable for this, primarily because of the size and volume of the data to be processed, but also because it ensures standardization and consistency. While some of these labels can be extracted directly from the textual metadata, many of the data available do not contain explicit text informing the researcher about the age and gender of the subjects with the study. To bridge this gap, machine-learning methods can be trained to use the gene expression patterns associated with the text-derived labels to refine label-prediction confidence.
resultsOur analysis shows only 26% of metadata text contains information about gender and 21% about age. In order to ameliorate the lack of available labels for these data sets, we first extract labels from the textual metadata for each GEO RNA dataset and evaluate the performance against a gold standard of manually curated labels. We then use machine-learning methods to predict labels, based upon gene expression of the samples and compare this to the text-based method.
conclusionHere we present an automated method to extract labels for age, gender, and tissue from textual metadata and GEO data using both a heuristic approach as well as machine learning. We show the two methods together improve accuracy of label assignment to GEO samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.