Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297276›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

ALE: automated label extraction from GEO metadata.

Cory B Giles, Chase A Brown, Michael Ripperger, Zane Dennis, Xiavan Roopnarinesingh, Hunter Porter, Aleksandra Perz, Jonathan D Wren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. RummaGEO: Automatic Mining of Human and Mouse Gene Sets from GEO.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. GeMI: interactive interface for transformer-based Genomic Metadata Integration.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cory B GilesArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Chase A BrownArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Michael RippergerVanderbilt University, 2201 West End Ave, Nashville, TN, USA.
Zane DennisDepartment of Computer Science, Baylor University, Hankamer Academic Building, 105 Baylor Ave, Waco, TX, 76706, USA.
Xiavan RoopnarinesinghArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Hunter PorterArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Aleksandra PerzArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Jonathan D WrenArthritis & Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. jonathan-wren@omrf.org.

Funding

Understanding connective tissue development and disease with PDGFR-driven..... P20GM103636 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI THOMPSON, LINDA F · 2013 to 2023
$26.9M
Targeted DNA Methylation and Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy CoreP30AG050911 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI HOLLY VAN REMMEN · 2015 to 2026
$13.9M
GEROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAM IN OKLAHOMAT32AG052363 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Benjamin Francis Miller, William Edmund Sonntag · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
Testing the mechanisms by which NMJ disruption contributes to sarcopeniaI01BX002595 · VA · SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI VAN REMMEN, HOLLY · 2015 to 2017
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002595NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050911NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052363NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a rich community resource containing millions of gene expression experiments from human, mouse, rat, and other model organisms. However, information about each experiment (metadata) is in the format of an open-ended, non-standardized textual description provided by the depositor. Thus, classification of experiments for meta-analysis by factors such as gender, age of the sample donor, and tissue of origin is not feasible without assigning labels to the experiments. Automated approaches are preferable for this, primarily because of the size and volume of the data to be processed, but also because it ensures standardization and consistency. While some of these labels can be extracted directly from the textual metadata, many of the data available do not contain explicit text informing the researcher about the age and gender of the subjects with the study. To bridge this gap, machine-learning methods can be trained to use the gene expression patterns associated with the text-derived labels to refine label-prediction confidence.

resultsOur analysis shows only 26% of metadata text contains information about gender and 21% about age. In order to ameliorate the lack of available labels for these data sets, we first extract labels from the textual metadata for each GEO RNA dataset and evaluate the performance against a gold standard of manually curated labels. We then use machine-learning methods to predict labels, based upon gene expression of the samples and compare this to the text-based method.

conclusionHere we present an automated method to extract labels for age, gender, and tissue from textual metadata and GEO data using both a heuristic approach as well as machine learning. We show the two methods together improve accuracy of label assignment to GEO samples.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene ExpressionMetadataAge FactorsAnimalsAutomationDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene OntologyHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence AnnotationRatsReference StandardsGene expressionGene expression omnibusMeta-analysisText mining

Identifiers

PMID29297276
PMCPMC5751806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.