ArticleClinical neuroradiology2019
Endovascular Stroke Treatment on Single-Plane vs. Bi-Plane Angiography Suites : Technical Considerations and Evaluation of Treatment Success.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physician Transfer Versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Radiation Exposure in Elective Endovascular Carotid Artery Stenting.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Matched-Pair Analysis of Patients With Large-Vessel Occlusions Undergoing Thrombectomy Using Single-Plane Versus Biplane Angiography.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Intra-operative soft tissue perfusion assessment using X-ray angiography images: ischemic stroke study.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Interdisciplinary Rendez-Vous Approach in Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A New Concept to Accelerate Mechanical Thrombectomy in Primary Stroke Centers.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke : Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- World Federation for Interventional Stroke Treatment (WIST) multispecialty training guidelines for endovascular stroke intervention.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation.Science robotics · 2022Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Neuro-thrombectomy on Single compared to Biplane Angiography Systems.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Mandatory Neuroendovascular Evolution: Meeting the New Demands.Interventional neurology · 2020Review
- Bi-plane and single plane angiography: a study to compare contrast usage and radiation doses for adult cardiac patients in diagnostic studies.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndovascular stroke therapy is mostly available in comprehensive stroke centers with state of the art bi-plane angiography suites. The aim of the present study was to analyze if it is justifiable to treat patients with alternative x‑ray machines in the case of capacity constraints, or if it is mandatory to refer patients in such cases. Secondly, we wanted to draw conclusions for the feasibility of different logistic approaches in stroke treatment, such as a "helistroke" concept.
methodsThis was a retrospective dual center analysis of all patients treated on a single-plane angiography suite between 2009 and 2017. A propensity scored matching analysis at a 1:3 ratio was performed with patients treated on a bi-plane angiography suite to receive homogeneous groups.
resultsA total of 42 patients were treated on a single-plane angiography suite and were compared to 126 patients treated on a bi-plane angiography suite. No significant differences in technical parameters, procedure times, recanalization success and complications could be detected. Also, there was no difference in the clinical outcome between the two groups. The only significant difference was the higher amount of radiation dose used on the bi-plane angiography machines to achieve the final results (205,660 mGy × cm DISCUSSION: In an era of an ever-changing stroke infrastructure and an increasing demand in thrombectomy procedures, it is feasible and safe for experienced neurointerventionalists to perform endovascular stroke procedures on single-plane angiography units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.