Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29297082›Full record

ReviewJAMA2018

Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review.

Hallie C Prescott, Derek C Angus

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 581 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
581citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
54.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03865602 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): A Pragmatic Randomized Evaluation of Implementing Best Practice Care for Sepsis Survivors to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled712ConditionsClinical SepsisArmsSepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR), Usual care
NCT04495946 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Implementation and Effectiveness of Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2020 to 2024Enrolled3,894ConditionsSepsisArmsSepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program, Usual care
NCT05193045 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prognosis of Klebsiella ESBL Sepsis: Role of 2-HYDRoxy-myristate in Endotoxin Structure

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2021 to 2023Enrolled28ConditionsKlebsiella Infections
NCT05511129 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Tolerance and Efficacy of Amiklin Administration During Nosocomial Infections Complicating COVID-19 in the ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,053ConditionsCOVID-19, Nosocomial Infection
NCT07453901 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Multicentre Prospective Observational Study on the Management of Septic Shock (Observational Study on Septic Shock, the OSS Study)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBicetre HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled5,000ConditionsSeptic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

581 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 986 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

521 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hallie C PrescottDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Derek C AngusThe Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · US

Funding

Late cardiovascular consequences of septic shockR01GM097471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YENDE, SACHIN · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
General pathways and personalized risk of morbidity after sepsisK08GM115859 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE · 2015 to 2018
$776k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM115859NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Survival from sepsis has improved in recent years, resulting in an increasing number of patients who have survived sepsis treatment. Current sepsis guidelines do not provide guidance on posthospital care or recovery. Observations: Each year, more than 19 million individuals develop sepsis, defined as a life-threatening acute organ dysfunction secondary to infection. Approximately 14 million survive to hospital discharge and their prognosis varies. Half of patients recover, one-third die during the following year, and one-sixth have severe persistent impairments. Impairments include development of an average of 1 to 2 new functional limitations (eg, inability to bathe or dress independently), a 3-fold increase in prevalence of moderate to severe cognitive impairment (from 6.1% before hospitalization to 16.7% after hospitalization), and a high prevalence of mental health problems, including anxiety (32% of patients who survive), depression (29%), or posttraumatic stress disorder (44%). About 40% of patients are rehospitalized within 90 days of discharge, often for conditions that are potentially treatable in the outpatient setting, such as infection (11.9%) and exacerbation of heart failure (5.5%). Compared with patients hospitalized for other diagnoses, those who survive sepsis (11.9%) are at increased risk of recurrent infection than matched patients (8.0%) matched patients (P < .001), acute renal failure (3.3% vs 1.2%, P < .001), and new cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] range, 1.1-1.4). Reasons for deterioration of health after sepsis are multifactorial and include accelerated progression of preexisting chronic conditions, residual organ damage, and impaired immune function. Characteristics associated with complications after hospital discharge for sepsis treatment are not fully understood but include both poorer presepsis health status, characteristics of the acute septic episode (eg, severity of infection, host response to infection), and quality of hospital treatment (eg, timeliness of initial sepsis care, avoidance of treatment-related harms). Although there is a paucity of clinical trial evidence to support specific postdischarge rehabilitation treatment, experts recommend referral to physical therapy to improve exercise capacity, strength, and independent completion of activities of daily living. This recommendation is supported by an observational study involving 30 000 sepsis survivors that found that referral to rehabilitation within 90 days was associated with lower risk of 10-year mortality compared with propensity-matched controls (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In the months after hospital discharge for sepsis, management should focus on (1) identifying new physical, mental, and cognitive problems and referring for appropriate treatment, (2) reviewing and adjusting long-term medications, and (3) evaluating for treatable conditions that commonly result in hospitalization, such as infection, heart failure, renal failure, and aspiration. For patients with poor or declining health prior to sepsis who experience further deterioration after sepsis, it may be appropriate to focus on palliation of symptoms.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultCognition DisordersHospitalizationHumansMental DisordersSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29297082
PMCPMC5839473
OpenAlexW2782135811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.