Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2018
Association of Cardiovascular Risk With Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study.
Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations in patients with COPD: a systematic review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePooled it
- Inhalation therapies in COPD - adverse drug reactions impact on emergency department presentations.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Trial
- Long-acting antimuscarinic therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving beta-blockers.Respiratory research · 2021Trial
- Single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol and umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: results on cardiovascular safety from the IMPACT trial.Respiratory research · 2020Trial
- Revefenacin, a Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist, Does Not Prolong QT Interval in Healthy Subjects: Results of a Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Thorough QT Study.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Updates in COPD Management: From Inflammatory Pathways to Targeted Therapies.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Gut microbial trimethylamine N-oxide generation promotes risk of atrial fibrillation via muscarinic receptor-mediated autonomic dysfunction.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Risk During the 90-Day Vulnerable Window After COPD Exacerbations: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Acute and 14-day effects of tiotropium/olodaterol on cardiopulmonary function in COPD.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Implications of the Enhanced Games: Performance Enhancing Drugs in Competition and Recreation.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
- Cardiac disorders associated with compound long-acting bronchodilators for inhalation: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating Arrhythmia Risk in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Aclidinium/Formoterol Fumarate and Other Inhaled Bronchodilators: A Post-Authorization Safety Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma: Final Analysis of a Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A combination not to be underestimated.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients with COPD Prescribed with LABA or LAMA: A Real-World Territory Wide Study.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Management of COPD With Cardiovascular Risk in Asia: A Review by the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology COPD Assembly.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
- Inflammatory lung diseases: a clinical and scientific review of the latest advances and challenges.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- The Complex Relationship Between Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The associations between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or long-acting antimuscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are greatly debated. Pivotal and relevant randomized clinical trials included prior LABA or LAMA users and excluded patients with baseline CVD; therefore, cardiovascular events arising from first-time LABA or LAMA use, if any, could not be observed. There is an urgent need to examine whether new use of and duration since initiating LABAs and LAMAs could act as important determinants of cardiovascular events. Objective: To investigate risk of CVD associated with LABAs and LAMAs, focusing on the initiation and duration of LABA and LAMA therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study included 284 220 LABA-LAMA-naïve patients with COPD at least 40 years old (mean age, 71.4 years; 68.9% men), retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for health care claims from 2007 to 2011. Exposure: LABA or LAMA use was measured in the year preceding the event or index date, stratified by duration since initiation of LABA or LAMA treatment, new and prevalent users, concomitant COPD medications, and individual agents. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cases with inpatient or emergency care visits for coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemic stroke, or arrhythmia were identified and individually matched to 4 randomly selected controls. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to estimate odds ratios of CVD from LABA and LAMA treatment. Results: During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 37 719 patients with CVD (mean age, 75.6 years; 71.6% men) and 146 139 matched controls (mean age, 75.2 years; 70.1% men) were identified. New LABA and LAMA use in COPD was associated with a 1.50-fold (95% CI, 1.35-1.67; P < .001) and a 1.52-fold (95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P < .001) increased cardiovascular risk within 30 days of initiation, respectively, whereas the risk was absent, or even reduced with prevalent use. Individual LABA agents, LAMA dosage forms, and concomitant COPD regimens did not differ in the CVD risks. The risk persisted in an alternative case-crossover study and remained across subgroups without CVD history or prior exacerbations. Conclusions and Relevance: New initiation of LABAs or LAMAs in patients with COPD is associated with an approximate 1.5-fold increased severe cardiovascular risk, irrespective of prior CVD status and history of exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.