Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296951›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2017

T-cell assays confirm immunogenicity of tungsten-induced erythropoietin aggregates associated with pure red cell aplasia.

Tina Rubic-Schneider, Masataka Kuwana, Brigitte Christen, Manuela Aßenmacher, Otmar Hainzl, Frank Zimmermann, Robert Fischer, Vera Koppenburg, Salah-Dine Chibout, Timothy M Wright and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Immunogenicity of Protein Pharmaceuticals.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tina Rubic-SchneiderDiscovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Masataka KuwanaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Brigitte ChristenDiscovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Manuela AßenmacherTechnical Development Biosimilars, Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Otmar HainzlTechnical Development Biosimilars, Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Frank ZimmermannTechnical Development Biosimilars, Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Robert FischerTechnical Development Biosimilars, Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Vera KoppenburgSandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Salah-Dine ChiboutDiscovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Timothy M WrightNovartis Pharma Development, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas SeidlTechnical Development Biosimilars, Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, Oberhaching, Germany; and.
Michael KammüllerDiscovery and Investigative Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Germany) · DENovartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchNovartis (Switzerland) · CHKeio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenicity of biotherapeutics and the elicitation of anti-drug antibodies are a key concern for their efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety. A particularly severe consequence of immunogenicity of a biotherapeutic is the rare development of antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) in anemic patients treated with aggregated forms of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO). Here, we investigated in vitro T-cell responses to experimentally heat-induced rhEPO aggregates, and to tungsten-induced rhEPO aggregates in clinical lots associated with rhEPO-neutralizing antibodies and PRCA. Heat-stressed rhEPO elicited T-cell responses only in blood obtained from healthy individuals identified as responders, whereas nonstressed rhEPO overall did not induce reactions neither in responders nor nonresponders. Tungsten-induced rhEPO aggregates in clinical lots associated with rhEPO-neutralizing antibodies and PRCA could induce in vitro T-cell responses in blood obtained from healthy donors, in contrast to rhEPO from low tungsten syringes. Importantly, ex vivo T-cell recall responses of patients treated with rhEPO without PRCA showed no T-cell responses, whereas T cells of a patient who developed PRCA after treatment with a clinical batch with elevated levels of tungsten and rhEPO aggregates showed a clear response to rhEPO from that clinical batch. To our knowledge, this is the first time that T-cell assays confirm the root cause of increased rhEPO immunogenicity associated with PRCA.

Identifiers

PMID29296951
PMCPMC5738985
OpenAlexW2587046531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.