Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296906›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2017

Cytogenetics-based risk prediction of blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of TKI therapy.

Zimu Gong, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Jorge E Cortes, Zi Chen, Lan Zheng, Yan Li, Shi Bai, Pei Lin, Roberto N Miranda, Jeffrey L Jorgensen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in China (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The New ELN Recommendations for Treating CML.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zimu GongDepartment of Hematopathology and.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Jorge E CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Zi ChenDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Lan ZhengDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Yan LiDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Shi BaiDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Pei LinDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Roberto N MirandaDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Jeffrey L JorgensenDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Timothy J McDonnellDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Wei WangDepartment of Hematopathology and.
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Shimin HuDepartment of Hematopathology and.ORCID 0000-0001-7110-3814
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high fatality of patients with blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) necessitates identification of high-risk (HR) patients to prevent onset of BP. Here, we investigated the risk of BP based on additional chromosomal abnormality (ACA) profiles in a cohort of 2326 CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We examined the time intervals from initial diagnosis to ACA emergence (interval 1), from ACA emergence to onset of BP (interval 2), and survival after onset of BP (interval 3). Based on BP risk associated with each ACA, patients were stratified into intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and HR groups, with a median duration of interval 2 of unreached, 19.2 months, and 1.9 months, respectively. There was no difference in durations of intervals 1 or 3 among 3 groups. Including patients without ACAs who formed the standard-risk group, the overall 5-year cumulative probability of BP was 9.8%, 28.0%, 41.7%, and 67.4% for these 4 groups, respectively. The pre-BP disease course in those who developed BP was similar regardless of cytogenetic alterations, and 84.4% of BP patients developed BP within the first 5 years of diagnosis. In summary, interval 2 is the predominant determinant of BP risk and patient outcome. By prolonging the duration of interval 2, TKI therapy mitigates BP risk associated with low-risk ACAs or no ACAs but does not alter the natural course of CML with HR ACAs. Thus, we have identified a group of patients who have HR of BP and may benefit from timely alternative treatment to prevent onset of BP.

Identifiers

PMID29296906
PMCPMC5728641
OpenAlexW2771536078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.