Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296888›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2017

A clinical audit of thrombophilia testing in pediatric patients with acute thromboembolic events: impact on management.

Chakri Gavva, Ravindra Sarode, Ayesha Zia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypercoagulable workup in a community hospital setting: to test or not to test; that is the question.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2019
    Article
  7. Hereditary Antithrombin Deficiency in Pediatric Patients: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Antithrombin Replacement Therapy.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chakri GavvaDivision of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis, Department of Pathology, and.
Ravindra SarodeDivision of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis, Department of Pathology, and.
Ayesha ZiaDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-3283-0415

Funding

Predicting and Preventing Poor Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism in ChildrenK23HL132054 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIA, AYESHA · 2016 to 2020
$876k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL132054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilia defects is frequently performed in pediatric patients with thromboembolic events (TEEs). No consensus guidelines exist regarding the timing of testing or the type of patients to be tested. The primary objective of our study, therefore, was to determine whether thrombophilia testing during the acute TEE setting affected clinical management in pediatric patients. A secondary aim included estimation of potential harm from thrombophilia testing. We retrospectively reviewed data on all pediatric patients diagnosed with a TEE during a 1-year period. Fifty-two (51%) of 102 patients with a TEE underwent thrombophilia testing during the acute phase, with 26 patients (50%) having a positive test result during the acute phase. Only 12% of patients tested were confirmed to have a thrombophilia eventually, yielding a false-positive rate of ∼7% for testing when performed in the acute setting. There were no changes to the acute management, regardless of a positive or negative result. Testing resulted in unnecessary blood loss in 12 patients younger than 1 year and acute testing cost approximately $82 000. Our data show that thrombophilia testing during acute TEEs in pediatric patients did not impact clinical management. There is also a potential for false-positive tests leading to unnecessary long-term anticoagulation. These findings suggest against thrombophilia testing during acute TEE setting in children.

Identifiers

PMID29296888
PMCPMC5729621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.