Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296837›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2017

Baseline mutational patterns and sustained MRD negativity in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma.

Sham Mailankody, Dickran Kazandjian, Neha Korde, Mark Roschewski, Elisabet Manasanch, Manisha Bhutani, Nishant Tageja, Mary Kwok, Yong Zhang, Adriana Zingone and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The consultant's guide to smoldering multiple myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Progress in the Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Designing Evolutionary-based Interception Strategies to Block the Transition from Precursor Phases to Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. How We Approach Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  20. Second malignancies in multiple myeloma; emerging patterns and future directions.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sham MailankodyMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Dickran KazandjianCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Neha KordeMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Mark RoschewskiCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Elisabet ManasanchDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Manisha BhutaniLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC.
Nishant TagejaCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Mary KwokHematology/Oncology Department, John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Yong ZhangCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Adriana ZingoneCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Laurence LamyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Rene CostelloCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Candis MorrisonCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Malin HultcrantzMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Austin ChristoffersonIntegrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Megan WashingtonIntegrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Martin BoatengIntegrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and.
Maryalice Stetler-StevensonCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
William D FiggCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Elli PapaemmanuilComputational Oncology, Epidemiology and Biostatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Wyndham H WilsonCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jonathan J KeatsIntegrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Ola LandgrenMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-4839

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Phase I study of bortezomib and DA-EPOCH-R with microarray in DLBCLZIABC010717 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WILSON, WYNDHAM H · 2009 to 2021
$1.7M
Cancer Research UK 21019NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early results of a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance in high-risk smoldering myeloma showed promising results that were previously published. Here, we provide novel insights into the genetic landscape of high-risk smoldering myeloma and information on sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with an expanded cohort of patients. Eighteen patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma were enrolled between 29 May 2012, and 14 January 2014. We included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in a parallel trial who received the same therapy (reference group). The overall response rate was 100%. With median potential follow-up of 43.3 months, 10 (63%) remain in MRD negativity, and the estimated 4-year progression-free and overall survival rates are 71% and 100%, respectively. Importantly, we report differences in mutational patterns in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, reflected in a lower frequency of mutations in significant myeloma genes (6.6% vs 45%) and

Identifiers

PMID29296837
PMCPMC5728141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.